On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:46 AM Bryn Llewellyn wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> ...
>
>
> It's already an example, so I don't see this as an improvement.
>
> ...
>
>
> The proposed additional text is flat-out wrong.
>
> What actually happens here is that text between quotes is considered
> quoted
Tom Lane wrote:...It's already an example, so I don't see this as an improvementThe proposed additional text is flat-out wrong.What actually happens here is that text between quotes is consideredquoted (so that, for example, commas within it are not field separators),but