On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 7:45 PM Curt Kolovson wrote:
> I’d vote for showing both (with RETURNING and without), since without it
> the second argument to SPI_exec has no effect in this example, which may
> not be obvious. That seems to be one of the subtle points illustrated by
> this example.
>
I’d vote for showing both (with RETURNING and without), since without it the
second argument to SPI_exec has no effect in this example, which may not be
obvious. That seems to be one of the subtle points illustrated by this example.
> On Jul 17, 2023, at 7:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "David
"David G. Johnston" writes:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 6:22 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think his point is that this example does not behave as the
>> documentation claims. Which it does not, according to my
>> tests here. I find this a bit disturbing --- did we intentionally
>> change the behavior
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 6:22 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" writes:
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 4:53 PM Curt Kolovson
> wrote:
> >> The actual results (shown below) are different than shown on this doc
> >> page.
>
> > SPI_exec sees "INSERT 0 2" as the command tag from the SQL
Tom is correct. It appears that nobody tested this example, which by the way
seems unnecessarily complicated.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 17, 2023, at 6:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "David G. Johnston" writes:
>>> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 4:53 PM Curt Kolovson wrote:
>>> The actual results
"David G. Johnston" writes:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 4:53 PM Curt Kolovson wrote:
>> The actual results (shown below) are different than shown on this doc
>> page.
> SPI_exec sees "INSERT 0 2" as the command tag from the SQL command you
> passed and so 2 is the output of the execq function
On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 8:26 AM David G. Johnston
wrote:
>
> No INFO messages appear because you did not include a returning clause. The
> 1 you passed to the call is immaterial if the query you supply doesn't
> produce a result set.
>
> David J.
>
indeed.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 4:53 PM Curt Kolovson wrote:
> The actual results (shown below) are different than shown on this doc
> page. The reason is because the second parameter to the UDF that is
> passed to SPI_exec is the maximum number of rows to return, or 0 for
> no limit. It is not the
The actual results (shown below) are different than shown on this doc
page. The reason is because the second parameter to the UDF that is
passed to SPI_exec is the maximum number of rows to return, or 0 for
no limit. It is not the maximum number of rows to process. In the case
of "SELECT
On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 05:57:40AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> I was reading the documentation about pg_ctl and there everything was well
> written about the usage and option that can be used with the pg_ctl command
> but there is not mentioned that we can not run pg_ctl command as root
10 matches
Mail list logo
