No, it does not. If you refer to `An empty grantee field in an aclitem
stands for PUBLIC.` then "grantee field" was never described. What is
this?
It would be very clear if it was described in this way:
The access privileges has the following format: "grantee=privileges/who grants".
On Sun, Dec
"David G. Johnston" writes:
> We probably should write the syntax like we do everywhere else:
> [grantee]={privilege[*]}[…]/grantor
> Then define the placeholders in the subsequent paragraph.
Seems reasonable. About like this?
regards, tom lane
diff --git
On Monday, December 25, 2023, David G. Johnston
wrote:
> On Monday, December 25, 2023, Eugen Konkov wrote:
>
>> No, it does not. If you refer to `An empty grantee field in an aclitem
>> stands for PUBLIC.` then "grantee field" was never described. What is
>> this?
>>
>> It would be very clear
On Monday, December 25, 2023, Eugen Konkov wrote:
> No, it does not. If you refer to `An empty grantee field in an aclitem
> stands for PUBLIC.` then "grantee field" was never described. What is
> this?
>
> It would be very clear if it was described in this way:
> The access privileges has the
On Friday, December 22, 2023, PG Doc comments form
wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/ddl-priv.html
> Description:
>
> Hello.
> The page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-priv.html does not
>
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/ddl-priv.html
Description:
Hello.
The page https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/ddl-priv.html does not
describe what =Tc/user means. Also I did not find a link to appropriate page
