Re: Incorrect/confusing information about timetz

2023-09-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 05:00:59PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 04:41:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > Uh, yes to the storage part, no to the output part. ;-) Postgres does > > > store the timetz time zone offset, but it doesn't adust it once

Re: Incorrect/confusing information about timetz

2023-09-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 04:41:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > Uh, yes to the storage part, no to the output part. ;-) Postgres does > > store the timetz time zone offset, but it doesn't adust it once it is > > stored so doesn't adjust for the session time zone: > >

Re: Incorrect/confusing information about timetz

2023-09-07 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > Uh, yes to the storage part, no to the output part. ;-) Postgres does > store the timetz time zone offset, but it doesn't adust it once it is > stored so doesn't adjust for the session time zone: Right, it just stores a numeric UTC offset. > Do we want to document

Re: Incorrect/confusing information about timetz

2023-09-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 06:03:43PM +, PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/datatype-datetime.html > Description: > > This statement in section 8.5.3 states > "All timezone-aware dates

Incorrect/confusing information about timetz

2023-05-20 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/datatype-datetime.html Description: This statement in section 8.5.3 states "All timezone-aware dates and times are stored internally in UTC. They are converted to local time in the zone