Re: Not clear spelling about transaction

2023-09-30 Thread David G. Johnston
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 1:07 PM PG Doc comments form 
wrote:

> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/continuous-archiving.html
> Description:
>
> >No committed transactions will be lost
>
> Hello. It is not clear to me. Did you mean:
> Not committed transactions will be lost
> Or
> None of committed transactions will be lost
> ?
>
> It would be simpler if you write that explicitly:
> All committed transactions will not be lost.
>

"Committed transactions will not be lost."

The word "No" means "none", it doesn't mean "not".

David J.


Not clear spelling about transaction

2023-09-30 Thread PG Doc comments form
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/continuous-archiving.html
Description:

>No committed transactions will be lost

Hello. It is not clear to me. Did you mean:
Not committed transactions will be lost
Or
None of committed transactions will be lost
?

It would be simpler if you write that explicitly:
All committed transactions will not be lost.