On Wed, 2022-12-07 at 14:32 -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> While I agree with the conclusion that the function signature is an example,
> and having more than one for these is probably overkill, we can address the
> OP's complaint quite easily by doing what we do in many other places, give
>
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 8:03 PM Kirk Wolak wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 4:21 PM Laurenz Albe
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 16:26 -0500, Kirk Wolak wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:45 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>> > > Laurenz Albe writes:
>> > > > Now I think that is taking it too far.
That was feedback on my issue I've never seen before. Thanks so much to all
of you.
С уважением, А. И.
вс, 4 дек. 2022 г., 06:03 Kirk Wolak :
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 4:21 PM Laurenz Albe
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 16:26 -0500, Kirk Wolak wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:45 AM
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 4:21 PM Laurenz Albe
wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 16:26 -0500, Kirk Wolak wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:45 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Laurenz Albe writes:
> > > > Now I think that is taking it too far. Your code sample would be
> great
> > > > for a tutorial,
On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 16:26 -0500, Kirk Wolak wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:45 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> > Laurenz Albe writes:
> > > Now I think that is taking it too far. Your code sample would be great
> > > for a tutorial, but it is too elaborate for the technical documentation.
> > > The
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:45 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Laurenz Albe writes:
> > Now I think that is taking it too far. Your code sample would be great
> > for a tutorial, but it is too elaborate for the technical documentation.
> > The example should focus on the sequence functions, but more than
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:22 PM Kirk Wolak wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:47 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Kirk Wolak writes:
>> > my goal is to get an "approach" accepted, this is the first.
>> Ultimately, I
>> > would love to see
>> > the documentation of functions with examples like this
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:47 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Kirk Wolak writes:
> > my goal is to get an "approach" accepted, this is the first.
> Ultimately, I
> > would love to see
> > the documentation of functions with examples like this everywhere.
>
> I'm not for that. func.sgml is already
Kirk Wolak writes:
> my goal is to get an "approach" accepted, this is the first. Ultimately, I
> would love to see
> the documentation of functions with examples like this everywhere.
I'm not for that. func.sgml is already massive, and doubling its size
with extensive examples doesn't seem
On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 10:34 PM Laurenz Albe
wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-11-26 at 23:22 -0500, Kirk Wolak wrote:
> > Your feedback would be appreciated.
>
> + Example
>
> I think you should use the tag to render that more conspicuous.
>
> I tried. it does not MAKE. It is not allowed in that
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:45 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> Laurenz Albe writes:
> > Now I think that is taking it too far. Your code sample would be great
> > for a tutorial, but it is too elaborate for the technical documentation.
> > The example should focus on the sequence functions, but more than
Laurenz Albe writes:
> Now I think that is taking it too far. Your code sample would be great
> for a tutorial, but it is too elaborate for the technical documentation.
> The example should focus on the sequence functions, but more than half
> of the code describes other parts of PostgreSQL:
On Sat, 2022-11-26 at 23:22 -0500, Kirk Wolak wrote:
> Your feedback would be appreciated.
> --- a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
> +++ b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
> @@ -17625,6 +17625,11 @@ $.* ? (@ like_regex "^\\d+$")
> command.
>
>
> +
> +SELECT nextval('myseq'::regclass);
> +
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 10:06 PM Kirk Wolak wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 9:58 AM David G. Johnston <
> david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 12:40 AM Laurenz Albe
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2022-11-24 at 15:50 -0500, Kirk Wolak wrote:
>>>
>> ..
> Regardless of the
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 9:58 AM David G. Johnston <
david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 12:40 AM Laurenz Albe
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2022-11-24 at 15:50 -0500, Kirk Wolak wrote:
>> >
>> > David, let me see how that looks. From an approach standpoint, I am
>> hearing:
>>
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 9:58 AM David G. Johnston <
david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 12:40 AM Laurenz Albe
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2022-11-24 at 15:50 -0500, Kirk Wolak wrote:
>> >
>> > David, let me see how that looks. From an approach standpoint, I am
>> hearing:
>>
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 12:40 AM Laurenz Albe
wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-11-24 at 15:50 -0500, Kirk Wolak wrote:
> >
> > David, let me see how that looks. From an approach standpoint, I am
> hearing:
> > 1) Keep the example near the definition minimal [just this function]
> > 2) It's okay to create
On Thu, 2022-11-24 at 15:50 -0500, Kirk Wolak wrote:
>
> David, let me see how that looks. From an approach standpoint, I am hearing:
> 1) Keep the example near the definition minimal [just this function]
> 2) It's okay to create an extra "row" [each function is in a ], right
> after the last
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 10:44 AM David G. Johnston <
david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 7:33 AM Kirk Wolak wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 5:33 AM Laurenz Albe
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 2022-11-24 at 02:41 -0500, Kirk Wolak wrote:
>>> > Alright, as I have the
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 7:33 AM Kirk Wolak wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 5:33 AM Laurenz Albe
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2022-11-24 at 02:41 -0500, Kirk Wolak wrote:
>> > Alright, as I have the documentation build working, and a slightly
>> better stylesheet,
>> > the comments on the last block
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 5:33 AM Laurenz Albe
wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-11-24 at 02:41 -0500, Kirk Wolak wrote:
> > Alright, as I have the documentation build working, and a slightly
> better stylesheet,
> > the comments on the last block were not aligned.
> > They are fixed now.
> >
> > Apologies
On Thu, 2022-11-24 at 02:41 -0500, Kirk Wolak wrote:
> Alright, as I have the documentation build working, and a slightly better
> stylesheet,
> the comments on the last block were not aligned.
> They are fixed now.
>
> Apologies for spamming this in... My first patch turned into 3 emails...
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 2:04 AM Kirk Wolak wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 11:06 PM Kirk Wolak wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 11:43 PM David G. Johnston <
>> david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 8:42 PM Kirk Wolak wrote:
>>>
Here is the updated version.
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 11:06 PM Kirk Wolak wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 11:43 PM David G. Johnston <
> david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 8:42 PM Kirk Wolak wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> ..
>> The wiki is an excellent place to prototype and coordinate. Beyond that,
>>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 11:43 PM David G. Johnston <
david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 8:42 PM Kirk Wolak wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 2:10 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 08:17:12AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>>> > The
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 8:42 PM Kirk Wolak wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 2:10 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 08:17:12AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>> >
>> > Page:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 2:10 PM Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 08:17:12AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> >
> > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/functions-sequence.html
> > Description:
> >
> >
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 08:17:12AM +, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/functions-sequence.html
> Description:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/functions-sequence.html
>
> I
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/functions-sequence.html
Description:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/functions-sequence.html
I don't see here any hints about how to use this function, and what the
regclass means.
29 matches
Mail list logo
