>"were not" is typical usage when stating a contrary-to-fact hypothetical.
> If the implementation (or you) didn’t do X, then Y bad thing could happen.
Really thanks for your kindly reply and explain.
Please forgive me for my poor English. Anyway, got it.
Regards,
Tang
t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
> PG Doc comments form writes:
>
>> small fix in description at [1] as follows
>
>> -If that were not done interrupted code that's currently inspecting errno
>> might see the wrong value.
>> +If that was not done interrupted code that's currently inspecting errno
>>
PG Doc comments form writes:
> small fix in description at [1] as follows
> -If that were not done interrupted code that's currently inspecting errno
> might see the wrong value.
> +If that was not done interrupted code that's currently inspecting errno
> might see the wrong value.
The existing
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/source-conventions.html
Description:
small fix in description at [1] as follows
-If that were not done interrupted code that's currently inspecting errno
might see the wrong value.
+If
