Re: [DOCS] [BUGS] pg 7.4beta1 doc bug: vacuum not updated

2003-08-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Would someone submit a patch? --- Joseph Shraibman wrote: > The output of the vacuum command on > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-vacuum.html > shows the output of the 7.3.x version. I noticed while brows

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc?

2003-08-16 Thread Dan Langille
Given I'm the smartass that volunteered in the first place, perhaps I should complete what I started. I work well with a deadline. When do you want this done? On 16 Aug 2003 at 12:41, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Now that we are in beta, does someone want to tackle a "security" > section in the docs

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc?

2003-08-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
I would say any time before 7.4 final, which should be in 4-6 weeks. --- Dan Langille wrote: > Given I'm the smartass that volunteered in the first place, perhaps I > should complete what I started. > > I work well with a

Re: [DOCS] [PERFORM] PostgreSQL vs. MySQL

2003-08-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Do we need to add a mention of the need for tuning to the install docs? --- Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 08:07:18PM +0200, Arjen van der Meijden wrote: > > > Andrew Sullivan wrote: > > > results under pro

Re: [DOCS] [GENERAL] pam-linux, /etc/shadow : HOW-TO

2003-08-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Would someone merge this into our CVS docs and submit a patch? --- ahoward wrote: > > note: i'm no sysad, nor do i even pretend to understand pam, the linux kernel, > or postgresql, but this setup is a safe, working, postgr

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc?

2003-08-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Now that we are in beta, does someone want to tackle a "security" section in the docs? --- Dan Langille wrote: > With reference to my post to the "PostgreSQL Password Cracker" on > 2003-01-02, I've promised to write a secur