Re: [DOCS] Time input documentation error

2003-09-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruno Wolff III wrote: > In table 8.11 in the 7.4 docs the following line: > 040506 ISO 8601 > suggests that '040506' is a valid input format for time. But in fact > it isn't accepted by either 7.3 or 7.4. > > For example: > area=> select '040506'::time; > ERROR: invalid input syntax for

Re: [pgsql-www] [DOCS] German FAQ update

2003-09-04 Thread Ian Barwick
On Thursday 04 September 2003 09:42, Dave Page wrote: > > Ian Barwick wrote: > > > BTW the FAQs on the website ( > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/#faqs ) > > > > > aren't up-to-date. > > > > Yep, main FAQ is dated from May. Seems the web site isn't > > pulling the FAQ's out of CVS like it u

[DOCS] OffsetNumber offnum (LOCKTAG in lock.c)

2003-09-04 Thread Sumaira Maqsood Ali
the offnum of LOCKTAG I gather indicates which row (tuple) is being locked in a row level locking. But when I lock 2 diffrent rows of a table, offset for both is 0. and also offset is 0 if i take a table lock on the same table. (blkno is the same for all three locks)..shouldnt the OffsetNumber

Re: [pgsql-www] [DOCS] German FAQ update

2003-09-04 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 03 September 2003 21:29 > To: Ian Barwick > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PostgreSQL www > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [DOCS] German FAQ update > > > Ian Barwick wrote: > > attached. > > > > BTW the FAQs on the website

[DOCS] short amendment to jdbc using large objects

2003-09-04 Thread Andreas Bauer
Hi, somebody could add to the jdbc using large objects documentation that a conn.commit() at the end is missing. I've never needed this statement in my db work, so I didn't have the faintest idea that I have to use it. So long Andi -- COMPUTERBILD 15/03: Premium-e-mail-Dienste im Test -