On Thursday, November 20, 2003, at 12:56 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
On Thursday, November 20, 2003, at 05:10 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Can we experiment with different SGML-to-HMTL font styles to find one
that's a
little easier on the eyes? What I find particularly difficult
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
>
> On Thursday, November 20, 2003, at 05:10 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Can we experiment with different SGML-to-HMTL font styles to find one
> > that's a
> > little easier on the eyes? What I find particularly difficult are the
> > function parameter columns; the mix
On Thursday, November 20, 2003, at 05:10 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Can we experiment with different SGML-to-HMTL font styles to find one
that's a
little easier on the eyes? What I find particularly difficult are the
function parameter columns; the mix of "normal" italics with "bold"
italics.
Comm
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> > Elein is correct, our variety of styles does look odd and can cause issues
> > with readability.See, for example,
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-string.html
> Compare with the "original" version:
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/doc
Josh Berkus writes:
> Elein is correct, our variety of styles does look odd and can cause issues
> with readability.See, for example,
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-string.html
>
> Can we experiment with different SGML-to-HMTL font styles to find one that's a
> littl
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 15:10, Josh Berkus wrote:
> People,
>
> > of varied sizes. The usage for different types
> > of objects seems to be fairly consistent,
> > however, the varied sizes of the different fonts
> > make things very hard to read.
>
> Elein is correct, our variety of styles does loo
People,
> of varied sizes. The usage for different types
> of objects seems to be fairly consistent,
> however, the varied sizes of the different fonts
> make things very hard to read.
Elein is correct, our variety of styles does look odd and can cause issues
with readability.See, for exampl
Robert Treat wrote:
> Can we add some kind of regression test, or at least a note in the
> release process somewhere, to ensure that *someone* can build html/pdf
> copies of the docs. I'm not even too concerned if it requires a narrow
> toolset, but it's something we ought to have ready for 7.5 whe
Can we add some kind of regression test, or at least a note in the
release process somewhere, to ensure that *someone* can build html/pdf
copies of the docs. I'm not even too concerned if it requires a narrow
toolset, but it's something we ought to have ready for 7.5 when it goes
out the door.
Rob