Le Jeudi 20 Novembre 2003 16:36, Bruce Momjian a écrit :
> Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> > >> As Peter has pointed out, the CSS can handle a lot of it. It doesn't
> > >> have to be hardcoded into the SGML-to-HTML transformation. One option
> > >> would be to use colors as well (I'm not talking a rain
On Friday, November 21, 2003, at 02:49 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Guys,
color, and I'd rather not use pink unless everyone else thinks it's
a
good idea.)
Yes, Josh, I *am* your father.
No!
(Sorry ;)
pink on white == totally illegible
Tell me about it! (Guess I could just make a little trip to
Guys,
> > > color, and I'd rather not use pink unless everyone else thinks it's a
> > > good idea.)
No! pink on white == totally illegible
> I use vim, it has good SQL coloring syntax. The one problem that I'd like
> to fix in it is that the body of PL/pgSQL functions are shown as a big
>
Michael Glaesemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just an idea. I think it's good to have some redundancy in
> distinguishing these things. Not only for those without color printers
> (poor souls ;) but also for people who have trouble distinguishing
> color differences.
Yes. I don't have an ob
On Friday, November 21, 2003, at 02:31 AM, Roberto Mello wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 12:16:58PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
When I was experimenting with different color schemes, I thought
about
perhaps matching the syntax coloring of my editor, BBEdit. However,
I'm
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 12:16:58PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> > When I was experimenting with different color schemes, I thought about
> > perhaps matching the syntax coloring of my editor, BBEdit. However, I'm
> > sure not all editors use the same color scheme (the
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> When I was experimenting with different color schemes, I thought about
> perhaps matching the syntax coloring of my editor, BBEdit. However, I'm
> sure not all editors use the same color scheme (the ANSI SQL language
> module for BBEdit displays only blue (keywords),
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 10:33:14AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Karel Zak writes:
>
> > One Czech XML guru suggest me use for this "profiling". For more
> > information see:
> >
> > http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/Profiling.html
>
> Sounds like a plan.
>
> I think as a first
On Friday, November 21, 2003, at 01:36 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
As Peter has pointed out, the CSS can handle a lot of it. It doesn't
have to be hardcoded into the SGML-to-HTML transformation. One
option
would be to use colors as well (I'm not talking a rainbow of fruit
f
Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> >> As Peter has pointed out, the CSS can handle a lot of it. It doesn't
> >> have to be hardcoded into the SGML-to-HTML transformation. One option
> >> would be to use colors as well (I'm not talking a rainbow of fruit
> >> flavors here :). In particular, I find italics
Karel Zak writes:
> One Czech XML guru suggest me use for this "profiling". For more
> information see:
>
> http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/Profiling.html
Sounds like a plan.
I think as a first step we should upgrade to SGML DocBook 4.2. Anyone
want to dig out the old patch for
11 matches
Mail list logo
