Re: [DOCS] My SGML build fixed

2003-12-13 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Good question --- historically, the SGML build on postgresql.org was > often broken, sometimes for months, and the build isn't frequent > enough for someone to commit an SGML change, then quickly view a new > build to see if errors were introduced. Wow, that must be ancient

Re: [DOCS] My SGML build fixed

2003-12-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > My 5-minute SGML build is now working again. The URL's are at the > > bottom of the developers page. > > Why do we need two builds anyway? Good question --- historically, the SGML build on postgresql.org was often broken, sometimes for months,

Re: [DOCS] My SGML build fixed

2003-12-13 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Bruce Momjian wrote: > My 5-minute SGML build is now working again. The URL's are at the > bottom of the developers page. Why do we need two builds anyway? ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http:/

[DOCS] My SGML build fixed

2003-12-13 Thread Bruce Momjian
My 5-minute SGML build is now working again. The URL's are at the bottom of the developers page. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be y