Re: [DOCS] My SGML build fixed

2003-12-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > > How often does the SGML check, > > > > > > 5 minutes > > > > > > > It means there is still too much instability in the running processes on > > > > those machines,

Re: [DOCS] My SGML build fixed

2003-12-19 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > How often does the SGML check, > > > > 5 minutes > > > > > It means there is still too much instability in the running processes on > > > those machines, yea. > > > > Oops, then we better hurry and

Re: [DOCS] My SGML build fixed

2003-12-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > "Peter Eisentraut" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Right now it just seems like a waste of resources and it confuses > > > the onlookers. > > > > If Bruce is willing to expend the resources, what's the problem? > > I kinda like having some redundancy

Re: [DOCS] My SGML build fixed

2003-12-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > How often does the SGML check, > > 5 minutes > > > It means there is still too much instability in the running processes on > > those machines, yea. > > Oops, then we better hurry and get the CVS repository and the mailing > lists off these mac

Re: [DOCS] problem with getting return type mismatch from function

2003-12-19 Thread Richard Huxton
On Thursday 18 December 2003 02:44, Jackson, Harold wrote: > Hi, > I'm having a problem with a function that I'm trying to create. I > created a data type that is composed of fields from 2 different tables. > When I create SQL functions this seems to work just fine. However, > when I try to