Re: [DOCS] Documentation of server configuration

Peter, > I have made an attempt and reformatted the whole section into one big > alphabetical list, and while that has obvious drawbacks, I feel that > it's already much more usable than what we have now. I disagree, absolutely and completely. "one big alphabetical list" doesn't help at all in

Re: [DOCS] Documentation of server configuration

Is it possible to have an alphabetical hyperlink index to the sections? I really like that it is in the same order as those in the file and the like parameters are grouped. But the table is too big and needs an index for faster access... no wait that was the database...no wait... elein On Sat

Re: [DOCS] Documentation of server configuration

Alvaro Herrera Munoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 04:17:26PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote: >> I thought runtime-config was supposed to be ordered in the same order as the >> default postgresql.conf ? > To what end? A lot of people may want to look up parameters without > nec

Re: [DOCS] Documentation of server configuration

On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 04:17:26PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote: > On Saturday 13 November 2004 15:20, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > I've just spent a day working through the current set of server > > configuration parameters, and I think that the documentation at > >

Re: [DOCS] Documentation of server configuration

On Saturday 13 November 2004 15:20, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I've just spent a day working through the current set of server > configuration parameters, and I think that the documentation at > has > reached its peak of unusability

Re: [DOCS] Documentation of server configuration

On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 09:20:51PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > I've just spent a day working through the current set of server > configuration parameters, and I think that the documentation at > has > reached its peak of un

[DOCS] Documentation of server configuration

I've just spent a day working through the current set of server configuration parameters, and I think that the documentation at has reached its peak of unusability. I haven't been able to find a single parameter all day except