Re: [DOCS] [PATCHES] Partitioning docs

2005-10-31 Thread Simon Riggs
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 23:27 -0500, Neil Conway wrote: > On Mon, 2005-31-10 at 23:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > I'd argue for editing first and then applying. I'll take up the job > > if you don't have time for the editing part > > Okay. I'll do a round of copy editing and then commit to CVS -- t

Re: [DOCS] [PATCHES] Partitioning docs

2005-10-31 Thread Neil Conway
On Mon, 2005-31-10 at 23:15 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > I'd argue for editing first and then applying. I'll take up the job > if you don't have time for the editing part Okay. I'll do a round of copy editing and then commit to CVS -- there will likely be room for additional improvements, so once it

Re: [DOCS] [PATCHES] Partitioning docs

2005-10-31 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2005-31-10 at 22:41 +, Simon Riggs wrote: >> I believe this is now complete and ready for application. > The changes need a fair bit of copy editing and SGML policy work, but > that is probably easier to do once it has been applied. Barring any

Re: [DOCS] [PATCHES] Partitioning docs

2005-10-31 Thread Neil Conway
On Mon, 2005-31-10 at 22:41 +, Simon Riggs wrote: > I believe this is now complete and ready for application. The changes need a fair bit of copy editing and SGML policy work, but that is probably easier to do once it has been applied. Barring any objections I'll apply the patch within 24 hour