Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Ph
Hi, I supplied a minor doco patch relating to porting pl/SQL to pl/pgSQL:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01295.php. Also
attached here.
Could someone please review and apply this for me?
Regards, Philip.
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 15. November 2005 12:23 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
> > There is no SGML toolchain because SGML has been abandoned as the
> > DocBook markup language. The toolchain that everybody else uses is
> > based on XML DocBook. It has been proposed that we abandon SGML a
Am Dienstag, 15. November 2005 15:04 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> Could the SGML be automatically converted to XML during the print
> process and then converted to PDF?
Certainly.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 15. November 2005 06:13 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> > I am still unclear why there is no more reliable SGML toolchain for PDF
> > output after all these years. Seems things have improved because we now
> > have bookmarks, but still, why is this functionality not
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I am still unclear why there is no more reliable SGML toolchain for PDF
> > output after all these years. Seems things have improved because we now
> > have bookmarks, but still, why is this functionality not more mainstream.
>
> There is no SGM
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 17:04 -0600, Judith Altamirano Figueroa wrote:
> Hi
>
> how could I restore a db if I did next:
>
> pg_dump -Z 9 soi > $DESTINO/soi.bkp
Since you don't specify any dump format, your dump should be plain text
and is compressed with gzip, so the restore command is going t
Am Dienstag, 15. November 2005 12:23 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
> There is no SGML toolchain because SGML has been abandoned as the
> DocBook markup language. The toolchain that everybody else uses is
> based on XML DocBook. It has been proposed that we abandon SGML and
> jump to XML, but the idea h
Am Dienstag, 15. November 2005 06:13 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> I am still unclear why there is no more reliable SGML toolchain for PDF
> output after all these years. Seems things have improved because we now
> have bookmarks, but still, why is this functionality not more mainstream.
I don't under
On Nov 15, 2005, at 20:23 , Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I am still unclear why there is no more reliable SGML toolchain
for PDF
output after all these years. Seems things have improved because
we now
have bookmarks, but still, why is this functionality not more
mainstream
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am still unclear why there is no more reliable SGML toolchain for PDF
> output after all these years. Seems things have improved because we now
> have bookmarks, but still, why is this functionality not more mainstream.
There is no SGML toolchain because SGML has been ab
11 matches
Mail list logo
