Re: [DOCS] Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file

2006-04-14 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > Richard Huxton wrote: >> To identify the current, partially-filled WAL segment, sort first by >> mtime and second by file name. That is, take the latest mtime among the >> properly-named files, breaking ties by taking the higher filename. > I am confused by this. Why do b

Re: [DOCS] Proposed doc-patch: Identifying the Current WAL file

2006-04-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
Richard Huxton wrote: > Reading Tom's posting here: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-04/msg00499.php > > I just realised we don't seem to mention this in the docs anywhere. I > propose adding a short paragraph to 23.3.1 > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/backup-online.h