Rolf Unger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The internal docs say that I can specify an optional pattern after the
> \df or the \df+. And I think I read somewhere that the pattern is meant
> to be a regular expression.
No, it's more a shell-style pattern. Use "*" and "?". "." separates
schema and o
Hi Folks,
actually I am not sure if this is the right mailing list, although I am
quite sure that this is a documenation issue:
I want to list the functions that are defined in a database and tried to
use the internal \df command of the psql terminal (I use emacs so I
don't need pgAdmin). Of cour
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > In discussion with Jim Nasby, I have updated the FAQ to strongly
> > encourage minor upgrading:
>
> > 3.6) Why do I need to do a dump and restore
> > to upgrade between major PostgreSQL releases?
>
> The item heading seems misleading about what
Bruce Momjian writes:
> In discussion with Jim Nasby, I have updated the FAQ to strongly
> encourage minor upgrading:
> 3.6) Why do I need to do a dump and restore
> to upgrade between major PostgreSQL releases?
The item heading seems misleading about what the contents are.
I think you n
In discussion with Jim Nasby, I have updated the FAQ to strongly
encourage minor upgrading:
3.6) Why do I need to do a dump and restore
to upgrade between major PostgreSQL releases?
The PostgreSQL team makes only bug fixes in minor releases,
so, for example, upgrading from 7.4.8 t
On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 15:22 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 16:20 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 12:24 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > And if we can't provide one, should we supply an SQL function
> > > > to return the current WA
