Re: [DOCS] Suggested changes to Tutorial

2006-08-01 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > I guess this comes back to.. why (really) haven't we switched to what > is widely considered the documentation standard, which is Docbook > XML. Every time this is brought up for discussion, people come up with irrelevant and incorrect arguments about this -- see last dis

Re: [DOCS] Suggested changes to Tutorial

2006-08-01 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Josh Berkus wrote: > > Josh... then why didn't you just submit a patch? > > See earlier conversation about the lack of good tools for > Docbook/SGML. Surely diff doesn't care. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---(end of broadcast)-