Re: [pgsql-www] Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?

On Monday 12 March 2007 17:27, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Dave Page wrote: > > Magnus Hagander wrote: > >> I'm bouncing this over to -www as well to hear what people think about > >> that part. If we do that, I'd definitely like to see a proper page and > >> not just a FAQ link. > > > > Agreed, thoug

Re: [pgsql-www] Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?

On 3/12/07, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dave Page wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> I'm bouncing this over to -www as well to hear what people think about >> that part. If we do that, I'd definitely like to see a proper page and >> not just a FAQ link. > > Agreed, though there's n

Re: [pgsql-www] Re: [DOCS] should we have a separate page that clearly defines what a minor release is and why it's a good idea to keep up with them?

Dave Page wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: >> I'm bouncing this over to -www as well to hear what people think about >> that part. If we do that, I'd definitely like to see a proper page and >> not just a FAQ link. > > Agreed, though there's no reason not to have both. Including it on the > main si