Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> BTW, why are neither contrib/dblink nor contrib/spi included in the
> >> conversion?
>
> > I see dblink:
> > http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/dblink.html
>
> Oh, in that case the question is why the contrib/db/doc/ fil
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> BTW, why are neither contrib/dblink nor contrib/spi included in the
>> conversion?
> I see dblink:
> http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/dblink.html
Oh, in that case the question is why the contrib/db/doc/ files are
still there.
> I assum
Tom Lane wrote:
> I am still desperately unhappy with the choice to put the contrib docs
> where they were put. They are by no stretch of the imagination part of
> the "SQL Language", and there is no defense for having inserted them
> into the middle of the part, in front of substantially more wid
I am still desperately unhappy with the choice to put the contrib docs
where they were put. They are by no stretch of the imagination part of
the "SQL Language", and there is no defense for having inserted them
into the middle of the part, in front of substantially more widely
interesting informat
Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Hello Bruce,
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have added a High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication
> > Feature Matrix table to the docs:
>
> Nice work. I appreciate your efforts in clearing up the uncertainty that
> surrounds this topic.
>
> As you might ha
Hello Bruce,
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have added a High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication
Feature Matrix table to the docs:
Nice work. I appreciate your efforts in clearing up the uncertainty that
surrounds this topic.
As you might have guessed, I have some complaints regarding th
