Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> What is the point of such a distinction?
>
> > If the contrib value is the source code itself then it seems a README is
> > more appropriate as people are not going to install the contrib module
> > itself --- the
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> What is the point of such a distinction?
> If the contrib value is the source code itself then it seems a README is
> more appropriate as people are not going to install the contrib module
> itself --- they are using it only to learn.
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Uh, don't start converting them yet. I now realize that
> > /contrib/dict_int is an example and just like the stuff in /contrib/spi
> > perhaps shouldn't have its docs moved to SGML.
>
> What makes you realize any such thing? You co
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Uh, don't start converting them yet. I now realize that
> /contrib/dict_int is an example and just like the stuff in /contrib/spi
> perhaps shouldn't have its docs moved to SGML.
What makes you realize any such thing? You could make that argument for
t
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I am still desperately unhappy with the choice to put the contrib docs
> > where they were put. They are by no stretch of the imagination part of
> > the "SQL Language", and there is no defense for having inserted them
> > into the middle of the part, in
Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Hello Bruce,
>
> thank you for your detailed answer.
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Not sure if you were around when we wrote this chapter but there was a
> > lot of good discussion to get it to where it is now.
>
> Uh.. IIRC quite a good part of the discussion for cha
Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> A Diumenge 11 Novembre 2007, Bruce Momjian va escriure:
> > Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> > > Sorry, I missed them, indeed I packed btree_gist instead of the good one
> > > btree-gist. The cube and xml2 have been added to.
> >
> > Thanks. All applied. I know peop
Hello Bruce,
thank you for your detailed answer.
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Not sure if you were around when we wrote this chapter but there was a
lot of good discussion to get it to where it is now.
Uh.. IIRC quite a good part of the discussion for chapter 23 was between
you and me, pretty exactl
A Diumenge 11 Novembre 2007, Tom Lane va escriure:
> I think there's a case for putting these pages under Part V Server
> Programming (though a few are not in fact server-side code), or under
> Part VI Reference (ignoring the fact that most of the text isn't in a
> uniform reference-page style ...
