Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Eh.. I think you misunderstood. The Sequoia people use RAIDb to mean
> Redundant Array of Inexpensive _Databases_. A possible setup might look
> like:
You are right. I didn't understand that. Interesting.
> > I am afraid we are stuck between clarity and understand
Hello Bruce,
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Depending on the RAIDb level you are using, Sequoia can be considered
multi-master (RAIDb-1) or single-master (RAIDb-0). Also note that
sequoia can run multiple controllers, thus it does not rely on one
central server.
But in those cases isn't the multi-mast
Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Hello Bruce,
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Uh, I think of PgCluster as multi-master, but in a way it is a hybrid
> > because there is a central server that gets all the queries.
>
> Yes, PgCluster as well as Sequoia use statement based replication.
> Sequoia is also c
