Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] "distributed checkpoint"

2007-12-07 Thread Greg Smith
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Simon Riggs wrote: "Smoothed" makes a lot of sense for me. We used to have a checkpoint spike, now we don't. To be accurate, there used to be a huge and unavoidable spike, now there's a control that aims to make it smaller. The problem hasn't completely gone away yet.

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?

2007-12-07 Thread Selena Deckelmann
On Dec 7, 2007 9:03 AM, Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> Historically, the only way to troubleshoot some of the contrib > >>> modules was to e-mail the author. If people think that we've >

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] "distributed checkpoint"

2007-12-07 Thread Simon Riggs
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 19:43 -0800, David Fetter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 07:19:44PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 20:44:49 -0500 > > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?

2007-12-07 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Joshua D. Drake wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Historically, the only way to troubleshoot some of the contrib modules was to e-mail the author. If people think that we've reached a standard that everything in /contrib is now well-documented and supported by

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?

2007-12-07 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Tom Lane wrote: Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Historically, the only way to troubleshoot some of the contrib modules was to e-mail the author. If people think that we've reached a standard that everything in /contrib is now well-documented and supported by the general community, the