Re: [DOCS] Plug in docs

2007-12-16 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Tom Lane wrote: Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 07:58 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: I think these are documented-in-the-source-code type issues. If they are an API they need to be documented. Code is poor (even well documented code) substitut

Re: [DOCS] Plug in docs

2007-12-16 Thread Tom Lane
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 07:58 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>> I think these are >>> documented-in-the-source-code type issues. >> >> If they are an API they need to be documented. Code is poor (even well >> documented code) substit

Re: [DOCS] Plug in docs

2007-12-16 Thread Simon Riggs
On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 07:58 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > >> Looks like we need some docs on all these new plugin APIs we've > >> introduced in this release. > >> > >> - PL/pgSQL hooks > >> - planner hooks > >> - join order hooks > > > > Do we normal

Re: [DOCS] Plug in docs

2007-12-16 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Bruce Momjian wrote: Simon Riggs wrote: Looks like we need some docs on all these new plugin APIs we've introduced in this release. - PL/pgSQL hooks - planner hooks - join order hooks Do we normally document these? I think these are documented-in-the-source-code type issues. If they are a

Re: [DOCS] Plug in docs

2007-12-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Simon Riggs wrote: > Looks like we need some docs on all these new plugin APIs we've > introduced in this release. > > - PL/pgSQL hooks > - planner hooks > - join order hooks Do we normally document these? I think these are documented-in-the-source-code type issues. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAI