Re: [DOCS] Problem building the documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Devrim G?ND?Z wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. > On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 17:51 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > OK, thanks. I didn't know there were newer TeX versions. Is their a > > PDF build of our development docs available somewhere? > > I'm building PDF docs regularly for each al

Re: [DOCS] Problem building the documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 17:51 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > OK, thanks. I didn't know there were newer TeX versions. Is their a > PDF build of our development docs available somewhere? I'm building PDF docs regularly for each alpha release. http://www.postgresql.org/developer/alpha Hope thi

Re: [DOCS] Problem building the documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On fre, 2010-01-22 at 11:16 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > [32.0.18 > > pdfTeX error (ext4): link annotations can't be nested. > > A random web search suggests that a newer TeX might be a good try. OK, thanks. I didn't know there were newer TeX versions

Re: [DOCS] Building PDF documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On fre, 2010-01-22 at 12:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > Wow, that is odd then. I pulled down a new copy of CVS, ran configure, > > > and got the same result: > > > > > $ gmake postgres.pdf > > > Makefile:172: *** Invalid target; use postg

Re: [DOCS] Building PDF documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On fre, 2010-01-22 at 12:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > Wow, that is odd then. I pulled down a new copy of CVS, ran configure, > > and got the same result: > > > $ gmake postgres.pdf > > Makefile:172: *** Invalid target; use postgres-A4.pdf or > > postgres-US.

Re: [DOCS] Problem building the documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On fre, 2010-01-22 at 11:16 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > [32.0.18 > pdfTeX error (ext4): link annotations can't be nested. A random web search suggests that a newer TeX might be a good try. -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your

Re: [DOCS] Building PDF documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > Wow, that is odd then. I pulled down a new copy of CVS, ran configure, > and got the same result: > $ gmake postgres.pdf > Makefile:172: *** Invalid target; use postgres-A4.pdf or > postgres-US.pdf as targets. Stop. > $ gmake postgres-A4.pdf >

Re: [DOCS] Building PDF documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Really? It seems to work for me without that. What do you observe > >> to go wrong? > > > $ gmake postgres-A4.pdf > > gmake: *** No rule to make target `postgres-A4.pdf'. Stop. > > Works for me ... sure you've got a clea

Re: [DOCS] Problem building the documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > My version is: > openjade:I: "openjade" version "1.3.2" > openjade:I: "OpenSP" version "1.5" > Is there some other version I should check. I used to be able to build > the PDF docs, so has anything changed that would have broken my tools? Dunno, here are som

Re: [DOCS] Building PDF documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Really? It seems to work for me without that. What do you observe >> to go wrong? > $ gmake postgres-A4.pdf > gmake: *** No rule to make target `postgres-A4.pdf'. Stop. Works for me ... sure you've got a clean copy of the makefile?

Re: [DOCS] Problem building the documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > I used to be able to build the PDF documentation. I am curious what > > changes others have made to allow PDF documentation builds. > > All the 8.4.x releases have built as PDF for me, using the current > docbook/tex tool chain on Fedora 11; and in fac

Re: [DOCS] Building PDF documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > I have determined that the HTML documentation must be built before any > > of the PDF makefile targets are valid, so I have applied the attached > > documentation patch to mention this. > > Really? It seems to work for me without that. What do you obs

Re: [DOCS] Problem building the documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > I used to be able to build the PDF documentation. I am curious what > changes others have made to allow PDF documentation builds. All the 8.4.x releases have built as PDF for me, using the current docbook/tex tool chain on Fedora 11; and in fact I don't remember ever seei

Re: [DOCS] Building PDF documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > I have determined that the HTML documentation must be built before any > of the PDF makefile targets are valid, so I have applied the attached > documentation patch to mention this. Really? It seems to work for me without that. What do you observe to go wrong?

[DOCS] Problem building the documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
In building the US PDF documentation I am getting this error from LaTeX: LaTeX Warning: Reference `RELEASE-8-2-7' on page xxxii undefined on input line 37586. LaTeX Warning: Reference `101577' on page xxxii undefined on input line 37612.

[DOCS] Building PDF documentation

2010-01-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have determined that the HTML documentation must be built before any of the PDF makefile targets are valid, so I have applied the attached documentation patch to mention this. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + I