On 18 August 2010 17:24, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 18 August 2010 17:19, Thom Brown wrote:
>> Please look at the attached images. These are taken from the 8.4.4 A4
>> PDF document. As you can see some examples in the PDF version of the
>> documentation are illegible, with text overflowing onto oth
On 18 August 2010 21:53, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2010-08-18 at 16:52 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>> In response to a user asking a question about indexes on primary keys
>> (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-08/msg00194.php)
>> I attach a patch to add information to the
On ons, 2010-08-18 at 16:52 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> In response to a user asking a question about indexes on primary keys
> (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-08/msg00194.php)
> I attach a patch to add information to the Primary Keys section of the
> Constraints page. While
I noticed that there is no Win32 example for archive_command in our 9.0
docs in the PITR setup docs:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-ARCHIVING-WAL
and no examples at all in the archive_command config section. We only
show Win32 recovery syntax
Thom Brown wrote:
> Well I guess the question is: "where will most people first look
> to find that piece of information out?"
The OP mentioned looking in the Indexes section of the documentation
for the answer.
> As long as the information isn't digressing from the topic it's
> mentioned in
On 18 August 2010 17:19, Thom Brown wrote:
> Please look at the attached images. These are taken from the 8.4.4 A4
> PDF document. As you can see some examples in the PDF version of the
> documentation are illegible, with text overflowing onto other text,
> and off the page.
>
> And the margins
On 18 August 2010 17:09, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>
>> In response to a user asking a question about indexes on primary
>> keys
>>
> (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-08/msg00194.php)
>> I attach a patch to add information to the Primary Keys section of
>> th
Thom Brown wrote:
> In response to a user asking a question about indexes on primary
> keys
>
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-08/msg00194.php)
> I attach a patch to add information to the Primary Keys section of
> the Constraints page. While the information already exists
In response to a user asking a question about indexes on primary keys
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-08/msg00194.php)
I attach a patch to add information to the Primary Keys section of the
Constraints page. While the information already exists on the CREATE
TABLE, I don't t
