Thom Brown writes:
> On 20 August 2010 14:45, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Perhaps "unspecified" is le mot juste.
> Yes, that sounds more appopriate.
OK, done. I found one other place in the docs where "random" seemed
to be used inappropriately, too.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent
On 20 August 2010 14:45, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thom Brown writes:
>> should be:
>> When a table is read, the rows will appear in an undefined order,
>> unless sorting is explicitly requested.
>
> Perhaps "unspecified" is le mot juste.
>
Yes, that sounds more appopriate.
--
Thom Brown
Registered Li
Thom Brown writes:
> should be:
> When a table is read, the rows will appear in an undefined order,
> unless sorting is explicitly requested.
Perhaps "unspecified" is le mot juste.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected])
To make
Keith Gabryelski submitted this comment for the docs, which I rejected
as a comment, but think still needs correcting in the docs:
the line:
When a table is read, the rows will appear in random order, unless
sorting is explicitly requested
should be:
When a table is read, the rows will appear in
