Re: [DOCS] 9.0 PDFs lost 'bookmarks' tab

2010-09-28 Thread Thom Brown
On 28 September 2010 16:29, Thom Brown wrote: > On 28 September 2010 15:36, Thom Brown wrote: >> On 28 September 2010 15:30, Kevin Grittner >> wrote: >>> "Erik Rijkers" wrote: >>> Something seems to have gone wrong with generating the version 9.0 PDFs on the website: both A4 and US h

Re: [DOCS] 9.0 PDFs lost 'bookmarks' tab

2010-09-28 Thread Thom Brown
On 28 September 2010 15:36, Thom Brown wrote: > On 28 September 2010 15:30, Kevin Grittner > wrote: >> "Erik Rijkers" wrote: >> >>> Something seems to have gone wrong with generating the version 9.0 >>> PDFs on the website: both A4 and US have no bookmarks tab.   (I'm >>> reading with Adobe Rea

Re: [DOCS] 9.0 PDFs lost 'bookmarks' tab

2010-09-28 Thread Thom Brown
On 28 September 2010 15:30, Kevin Grittner wrote: > "Erik Rijkers" wrote: > >> Something seems to have gone wrong with generating the version 9.0 >> PDFs on the website: both A4 and US have no bookmarks tab.   (I'm >> reading with Adobe Reader 7.0.0) > > Odd.  From this page: > > http://www.postg

[DOCS] pg_archivecleanup doc: changed -d output (doc)

2010-09-28 Thread Erik Rijkers
A small formatting change in pg_archivecleanup -d (debug) was committed a few weeks/months ago. The attached patch reflects that change in the documentation. Erik Rijkers doc-pg_archivecleanup.patch Description: Binary data -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To m

Re: [DOCS] 9.0 PDFs lost 'bookmarks' tab

2010-09-28 Thread Kevin Grittner
"Erik Rijkers" wrote: > Something seems to have gone wrong with generating the version 9.0 > PDFs on the website: both A4 and US have no bookmarks tab. (I'm > reading with Adobe Reader 7.0.0) Odd. From this page: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/ With Okular Version 0.9.2 the 9.0

[DOCS] 9.0 PDFs lost 'bookmarks' tab

2010-09-28 Thread Erik Rijkers
Something seems to have gone wrong with generating the version 9.0 PDFs on the website: both A4 and US have no bookmarks tab. (I'm reading with Adobe Reader 7.0.0) Just now I pulled from git.postgresql.org, and built the 9.0 and 9.1 A4 PDFs: these are both OK (have the bookmarks tab). (The 8.

Re: [DOCS] ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual

2010-09-28 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tis, 2010-09-28 at 02:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Greg Smith writes: > > I just made a pass through the wiki cleaning up all of the outdated CVS > > related stuff I knew of there that this page was pointing to. It's a > > sequential group of 9 changes to revert if we're forsaken and somehow

Re: [DOCS] [INTERFACES] ECPG Documentation Improvement (re-post)

2010-09-28 Thread Satoshi Nagayasu
nsive work. Is this possible? Any suggestions? If you want this reviewed, please send in a patch of the source code you changed. Patch is available at here: http://code.google.com/p/ecpgdocs/downloads/detail?name=ecpg-patches.20100928.tgz (I uploaded this to the GoogleCode, because this li

Re: [DOCS] ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual

2010-09-28 Thread Satoshi Nagayasu
On 2010/09/28 14:08, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Excerpts from Satoshi Nagayasu's message of mar sep 28 00:06:19 -0400 2010: On 2010/09/28 12:40, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Looking at this patch I cannot but wonder if this should be a table instead of a plain list. What's happen if you run the patch c