Re: [DOCS] Obsolete description in pg_ctl-ref.sgml

2010-12-14 Thread Fujii Masao
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Robert Haas wrote: >> At least the reference to section 31.14 is needless since password >> authentication doesn't affect the pg_ctl -w for now. But, on the second >> thought, it can still fail because of miss-configuration of connection >> variable, for example PG

Re: [DOCS] Is timestamptz alias documented?

2010-12-14 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar dic 07 15:35:53 -0300 2010: >> Chris writes: > >> > Is this a new alias, or >> > has it been around for some time? >> >> It's been around since the '90s I'm sure, maybe even back to Berkeley days. > >

Re: [DOCS] Obsolete description in pg_ctl-ref.sgml

2010-12-14 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Robert Haas wrote: Notes Waiting for complete startup is not a well-defined operation and might fail if access control is set up so that a local client cannot connect without manual in