On 19 January 2011 21:10, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thom Brown writes:
>> I've attached a couple minor fixes to the docs. One relating to
>> SECURITY LABEL and the other for pg_class.relpersistence
>
> Applied, thanks.
Cheers Mr Lane.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Regis
Thom Brown writes:
> I've attached a couple minor fixes to the docs. One relating to
> SECURITY LABEL and the other for pg_class.relpersistence
Applied, thanks.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your su
Hi, how about my more specific proposal, in the form of a patch, please? (it is
below in my quoted email of 8 Jan 2011.)
It's my first time offering a patch for PostgreSQL documentation, please let
me know if I've done it right or if I should change something.
Yours truly,
Aleksey
On Sat, Jan 8
Thom Brown wrote:
> relkind in the same table is the same type, but isn't displayed as
> "char" in the docs, and the same applies to many other system
tables.
> They would need changing too then.
>
> Examples are:
>
> pg_type.typtype
> pg_proc.provolatile
> pg_attribute.attstorage
That's a g
On 19 January 2011 18:11, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>
>> I've attached a couple minor fixes to the docs. One relating to
>> SECURITY LABEL and the other for pg_class.relpersistence
>
> relpersistence should be "char", not char.
> Oddly enough, there is a difference.
>
> -Kevin
r
Thom Brown wrote:
> I've attached a couple minor fixes to the docs. One relating to
> SECURITY LABEL and the other for pg_class.relpersistence
relpersistence should be "char", not char.
Oddly enough, there is a difference.
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.
Hi,
I've attached a couple minor fixes to the docs. One relating to
SECURITY LABEL and the other for pg_class.relpersistence
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
doc_fixes.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing li
