Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Dmitriy Igrishin's message of lun sep 20 15:52:43 -0400 2010:
> > Hey Bruce,
> >
> > Its interesting indeed, because I always wanted to know why libpq
> > named "libpq". Thanks!
> > But I wrote not about libpq functions, I just wanted to say about
> > unnecess
Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> >> Is that the direction we want to go, or would it be better to factor
> >> the information out into a separate page about compatibility gotchas?
> >
> > It would probably be better to explain globally applicable issues in a
> > separate section.
>
> I agree that a gener
