Applied.
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
> > Thom Brown wrote:
> > > On 12 August 2010 00:05, Thom Brown wrote:
> > >> I noticed that there are 2 linked entries for "Privileges":
> > >> http://www.postgres
Fabien COELHO writes:
> This issue makes the "information_schema" pretty useless for being really
> use for serious work as the data can be ambiguous, so I still claim that
> for me this is a real "bug" rather than just a "feature", which is the
> status reached once a bug is documented:-)
> W
2011/2/20 Bruce Momjian
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Excerpts from Dmitriy Igrishin's message of lun sep 20 15:52:43 -0400
> 2010:
> > > Hey Bruce,
> > >
> > > Its interesting indeed, because I always wanted to know why libpq
> > > named "libpq". Thanks!
> > > But I wrote not about libpq functions
Hello Bruce,
Is that the direction we want to go, or would it be better to factor
the information out into a separate page about compatibility gotchas?
It would probably be better to explain globally applicable issues in a
separate section.
I agree that a general caveat is better, together
