Re: [DOCS] Building PDFs error: \pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level than \pd

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Kupershmidt writes: >> Thanks for looking into this further. Both the -US and -A4 PDFs are >> still failing for me on a recent git checkout including your change to >> catalog.sgml. > > Hmph.  HEAD does build both US and A4 sizes for me, us

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > In theory, we have > documentation that explains this: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/docguide-toolsets.html While we're on the subject.. Attached is a patch against that page suggesting using openjade 1.3, not 1.4devel as p

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On tis, 2011-04-05 at 14:55 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> and I've also had failures, I believe, >> from not being connected to the Internet, which is surprising because >> it's not at all obvious that building the docs should require an >>

Re: [DOCS] EXTENSION keyword

On mån, 2011-04-04 at 11:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Daniele Varrazzo writes: > > looks like EXTENSION is missing from the keywords list in the docs. > > I believe Peter has a script for updating that table. Wonder if he's > run it lately ... Done -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-d

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations

On tis, 2011-04-05 at 14:55 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > and I've also had failures, I believe, > from not being connected to the Internet, which is surprising because > it's not at all obvious that building the docs should require an > Internet connection. I understand this problem, but just to cl

Re: [DOCS] developer FAQ

Excerpts from Heikki Linnakangas's message of mar abr 05 14:48:56 -0400 2011: > Hmm, is the /etc/mime.types file missing or somehow strange on that > host? When I do "git instaweb" on my laptop in a clone of the repository > and navigate to that index.html, it renders fine. Possibly ... > Howe

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > > I've also had failures, I believe, > from not being connected to the Internet, which is surprising because > it's not at all obvious that building the docs should require an > Internet connection. Oh, I've run into that and had it cause delay

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On mån, 2011-04-04 at 15:02 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> AFAICT, the biggest problem with our existing toolchain is that it's >> hard for some people to get it working.  In theory, we have >> documentation that explains this: >> >> http://w

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations

On mån, 2011-04-04 at 19:26 +0200, Susanne Ebrecht wrote: > Honestly, for German I don't mind yet if it is XML or SGML. XML might > be better in future for maintenance tools. > > Anyway, I figured out there is another argument for XML: > > My information is that DocBook 5.0 won't support SGML any

Re: [DOCS] developer FAQ

On 05.04.2011 21:28, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: On 05.04.2011 21:13, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Hi, I just noticed that the developer's FAQ has this question with a link to the anoncvs cvsweb: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Developer_FAQ#How_is_the_source_code_organized.3F The link is http://anonc

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations

Excerpts from Gabriele Bartolini's message of lun abr 04 16:47:26 -0400 2011: > Il 04/04/11 22:26, Robert Haas ha scritto: > > I think you still need to update Solution.pm to match. > > > Here it is, including change of 3 'Id' attributes (I made them lowercase). Pushed this one also. -- Álvaro

Re: [DOCS] developer FAQ

On 05.04.2011 21:13, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Hi, I just noticed that the developer's FAQ has this question with a link to the anoncvs cvsweb: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Developer_FAQ#How_is_the_source_code_organized.3F The link is http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/pgsql/src

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations

On mån, 2011-04-04 at 15:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > One thing I'd like to know is whether docbook v5 is any more > portable/easier to install. I don't see why. It's just a newer version of the same thing. If you change the sources to XML and switch to the XSL toolchain, you don't have to instal

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations

On mån, 2011-04-04 at 15:02 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > AFAICT, the biggest problem with our existing toolchain is that it's > hard for some people to get it working. In theory, we have > documentation that explains this: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/docguide-toolsets.html >

[DOCS] developer FAQ

Hi, I just noticed that the developer's FAQ has this question with a link to the anoncvs cvsweb: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Developer_FAQ#How_is_the_source_code_organized.3F The link is http://anoncvs.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/pgsql/src/tools/backend/index.html which no longer wor

Re: [DOCS] Missing doc for operator args in alter extension

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: > Hello, > > the documentation for ALTER EXTENSION is missing the description for > the arguments of the form ADD OPERATOR name (left_type, right_type). > > Albeit it's pretty obvious what they are, it is not so obvious what to > do for unary

Re: [DOCS] number of semaphores and semaphore sets

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: > This page: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/interactive/kernel-resources.html > > has formula: > ceil((max_connections + autovacuum_max_workers) / 16) > > for number of semaphore sets (identifiers). > > It seems to be wrong (outdated)

Re: [DOCS] Add strftime escapes to Log config

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: >> We could also link to >> , for >> example. > > That would be helpful.  I still think we want a few examples in our > docs, though. Patch? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://

Re: [DOCS] high-availibility..sgml typos

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote: > typos. I committed the first two, but I didn't remove the word "then" from "the WAL is then sent to the standby" because I don't think that's a typo. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

[DOCS] high-availibility..sgml typos

typos.--- doc/src/sgml/high-availability.sgml.orig 2011-04-05 08:47:30.0 +0200 +++ doc/src/sgml/high-availability.sgml 2011-04-05 08:56:09.0 +0200 @@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ Directly moving WAL records from one database server to another is typically described as log shipping.