Re: [DOCS] create foreign table

2011-09-15 Thread Ray Stell
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 06:43:59AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Ray Stell wrote: >> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-createforeigntable.html >> > It would be helpful if "SERVER" was defined if the parameters list >> > on this page. >> >> We don't usu

Re: [DOCS] Use of literal in SGML docs

2011-09-15 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Did we want to do any more on the issue of using for numbers > in our docs?  The February thread is here: > >        http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2011-02/msg00028.php > > While the applied patch removed the 'literal' tag from

Re: [DOCS] Building PDFs error: \pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level than \pd

2011-09-15 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On fre, 2011-01-28 at 12:11 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> > In my build, the entire contrib manual is potentially interdependent, >> > because the sub-sections of Appendix F don't start new pages.  This >> > seems bad.

Re: [DOCS] create foreign table

2011-09-15 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Ray Stell wrote: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-createforeigntable.html > It would be helpful if "SERVER" was defined if the parameters list > on this page. We don't usually document required keywords - they're just required. We do document the me

Re: [DOCS] documenting contrib modules (was Re: Building PDFs error)

2011-09-15 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Is this a TODO? Well, it's on my personal TODO list to wear down Tom's resistance to the idea. But I'm not sure we have any project-wide consensus on it at this point. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise

Re: [DOCS] 5.3.5. Foreign Keys (The SQL Language) possible enhance

2011-09-15 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Grzegorz Szpetkowski >> wrote: >> > I have some remark about >> > >> > "Now it is impossible to create orders with product_no entries that do >> > not appear in the products table." >> >