On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> It's for preventing pg_start_backup() from taking lots of time? If so,
> you're right in 8.3 and before. In 8.4 and later, instead, you can specify
> whether pg_start_backup() perfor
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Susanne Ebrecht's message of vie may 20 09:04:26 -0400 2011:
> > On 20.05.2011 13:56, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >>* Should we allow non-ASCII characters in general source files?
> > > Prefer "no" here.
> >
> > I only see two reasons for non-ASCII signs in En
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Grzegorz Szpetkowski
> wrote:
> > I have some remark about
> >
> > "Now it is impossible to create orders with product_no entries that do
> > not appear in the products table."
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/ddl-constraints.ht
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 19:48, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Well, I committed about five doc patches that day, and I had to decide
>> for each one whether it was worth back-patching,
>
>> I decided against back-patching this one
>
> Sounds fair.
>
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 19:48, Robert Haas wrote:
> Well, I committed about five doc patches that day, and I had to decide
> for each one whether it was worth back-patching,
> I decided against back-patching this one
Sounds fair.
For what it's worth, I wasn't doubting your judgement. Just that
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 19:58, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> Committed.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Do you think it should be backported to earlier versions too? As it
> > stands, the documentation is misleading.
>
> Well, I c
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 19:58, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Committed.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Do you think it should be backported to earlier versions too? As it
> stands, the documentation is misleading.
Well, I committed about five doc patches that da
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I think removing them from the docs but continuing to accept them makes
>>> sense. We do still hear from people migrating from 7.4 or older, and
>>> it's not always g
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > More thinking --- "PostgreSQL 9.0.3 Documentation" at the top center is
> > > already clickable, so that can act as the home. Let's duplicate that at
> > > the bottom too.
> >
> > OK, so here is a summary:
> >
> > o remove fast forward/backw
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 19:58, Robert Haas wrote:
> Committed.
Thanks!
Do you think it should be backported to earlier versions too? As it
stands, the documentation is misleading.
Regards,
Marti
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscripti
10 matches
Mail list logo