On 29 October 2011 02:04, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 28 October 2011 23:29, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas writes:
No response from kernel.org and the link still doesn't work, so we
still have 2 broken links.
>>
>> Is it unreasonable to assume that kernel.org will come back before any
>> d
On 28 October 2011 23:29, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>>> No response from kernel.org and the link still doesn't work, so we
>>> still have 2 broken links.
>
> Is it unreasonable to assume that kernel.org will come back before any
> doc change would have wide distribution? AFAIK they'r
On 10/28/2011 03:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas writes:
No response from kernel.org and the link still doesn't work, so we
still have 2 broken links.
Is it unreasonable to assume that kernel.org will come back before any
doc change would have wide distribution? AFAIK they're just cleani
Robert Haas writes:
>> No response from kernel.org and the link still doesn't work, so we
>> still have 2 broken links.
Is it unreasonable to assume that kernel.org will come back before any
doc change would have wide distribution? AFAIK they're just cleaning up
from an intrusion, they have not
Andrew, Thorsten,
What's the best place to link to the Linux PAM docs now that the
kernel.org copy is gone?
Thanks
--- Begin forwarded message from Thom Brown ---
From: Thom Brown
To: Pg Docs
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:52:36 -0300
Subject: [DOCS] Link to PAM pages broken
Hi all,
I notice tha
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 10 October 2011 19:15, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 10 October 2011 17:52, Thom Brown wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I notice that the links to both the Linux PAM page and Solaris PAM
>>> page are broken in our documentation. The bottom of the
>>>
