On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> It occurred to me that it could be useful to separate the information
> about which privileges are necessary for a certain SQL command into a
> separate section "Privileges" on each SQL command reference page.
> Currently, this informatio
"Kevin Grittner" writes:
> I guess the point is that for hundreds of years, the same day could
> have a different date depending which country's calendar you were
> looking at. I'm not entirely clear why there's a problem if you
> pick the Gregorian calendar and apply it retroactively.
Which is,
Florence Cousin wrote:
> At the bottom of the page about Date/Time types (
>
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/interactive/datatype-datetime.html
> )
> there is this sentence :
>
> Date conventions before the 19th century make for interesting
> reading, but are not consistent enough to warrant
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mar abr 17 14:40:37 -0300 2012:
>> It occurred to me that it could be useful to separate the information
>> about which privileges are necessary for a certain SQL command into a
>> separate section
Hi,
At the bottom of the page about Date/Time types (
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/interactive/datatype-datetime.html
)
there is this sentence :
Date conventions before the 19th century make for interesting reading,
but are not consistent enough to warrant coding into a date/time handler.
