On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> Well, I know we support the new pg_dump dumping back to 7.1, but I don't
>> know what our policy is for accepting old dumps.
>
> We're still going to very large lengths to load pre-7.3 dumps; see
> for instance ConvertTr
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" writes:
>> I guess the point is that for hundreds of years, the same day could
>> have a different date depending which country's calendar you were
>> looking at. I'm not entirely clear why there's a problem if you
>> pick the G
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:43:25PM -0700, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
> Hi. I'm trying to find a definition of "working set", it seems
> important for performance tuning, but I cannot find a PostgreSQL
> document defining it.
That is a great question, and I plan to write a blog about it soon.
Wor
Hi. I'm trying to find a definition of "working set", it seems
important for performance tuning, but I cannot find a PostgreSQL
document defining it.
Yours,
Aleksey
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/ma
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On sön, 2012-04-22 at 21:26 -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> > On lör, 2012-04-21 at 10:49 -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Josh Kupershmid
On sön, 2012-04-22 at 21:26 -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On lör, 2012-04-21 at 10:49 -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Josh Kupershmidt
> >> wrote:
> >> > Attached is a big patch fixing obvious ty
