On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 1:51 AM, gabrielle <gor...@gmail.com> wrote: > patch attached.
What version did you generate that off? It didn't apply cleanly.. Also, I think the change low->row is actually wrong. It applies to all low level modifications *including* row level modifications. But there can be other types of records. I manually rebased it since it was so small, and applied, though. Thanks! I did note, which I haven't noted before, that that page talks about the default wal_buffers being 8. That's clearly just wrong, and somethign that wasn't properly updated when we added autotuning of wal_buffers, isn't it? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
