Re: [DOCS] somewhat wrong archive_command example

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 09:11:01AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:15:30AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 09:46 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >> I thought the idea was just to show wh

Re: [DOCS] pgtesttiming.sgml, FreeBSD command output

Patch attached and applied for PG 9.3. --- On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 02:09:00PM -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote: > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On fre, 2012-07-06 at 13:21 -0700, Josh Kupershmidt

Re: [DOCS] Out of date advice about SIGTERM'ing backends

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 08:10:40PM -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote: > Hi all, > > In the "Notes" section[0] of the postgres command's page, this advice is > given: > > | The postgres server uses SIGTERM to tell subordinate server > | processes to quit normally and SIGQUIT to terminate without > |

Re: [DOCS] Comment on max_locks_per_transaction

I have applied the attached patch to document this issue. --- On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:05:30AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > Folks, > > Way it is now: > > === > > max_locks_per_transaction (integer) > > T

Re: [DOCS] vacuum monitoring in the doc

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:57:28AM +0200, Marc Mamin wrote: > Hello, > > I find that 2 informations on vacuum are quite hard to find in the doc: > > - "log_autovacuum_min_duration" is not listed in "What to log" > > ( http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/runtime-config-logging.html# > RUNT

Re: [DOCS] Observation on integer types documentation

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:38:47PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I have developed the attached patch based on your observations. Applied. --- > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 03:59:20PM -0500, Dan McGee wrote: > > Hey everyon

Re: [DOCS] ALTER TABLE ... CLUSTER ON synopsis

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:22:22AM -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > > The main inconsistency I notice on that page is that some of the > > subform descriptions repeat the whole syntax while others only show > > the initial keyword(s).  Should w

Re: [DOCS] somewhat wrong archive_command example

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:15:30AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 09:46 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> I thought the idea was just to show what a shell script might look like > >> --- we could say it does the sam

Re: [DOCS] somewhat wrong archive_command example

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 09:46 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> I thought the idea was just to show what a shell script might look like >> --- we could say it does the same as a single-line copy, but then people >> could improve it, or we could