2013/3/20 Tom Lane
> As Ian notes, that's the old syntax with a hard-wired option set.
> The lack of parentheses after WITH is the difference.
Aarfh, thanks, guys!
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/ma
Mario Duhanic writes:
> 2013/3/20 Tom Lane :
>> Huh? The references to FORCE_QUOTE look correct to me. The syntax
>> doesn't support multi-word option names, so it has to be like that
>> (or else run the words together, which doesn't sound like an
>> improvement).
> Thanks, Tom, for your quick
2013/3/20 Tom Lane :
> Huh? The references to FORCE_QUOTE look correct to me. The syntax
> doesn't support multi-word option names, so it has to be like that
> (or else run the words together, which doesn't sound like an
> improvement).
Thanks, Tom, for your quick response.
Maybe this is just a
2013/3/20 Tom Lane :
> Mario Duhanic writes:
>> Hi,
>>- http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-copy.html,
>>- http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-copy.html and
>>- http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-copy.html
>
>> have underscores ("_") where there should be
Mario Duhanic writes:
> Hi,
>- http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-copy.html,
>- http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-copy.html and
>- http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-copy.html
> have underscores ("_") where there should be none,
> e.g. in "FORCE_QUOTE
Hi,
- http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-copy.html,
- http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-copy.html and
- http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-copy.html
have underscores ("_") where there should be none,
e.g. in "FORCE_QUOTES".
Best regards,
