Re: [DOCS] obsolete pg_receivexlog note?

2014-11-05 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 11/5/14 6:54 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > In this paragraph, is it worth mentioning as well that the tradeoff > when using replication slots is to monitor the xlog partition to be > sure it doesn't get full? Might as well. -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To ma

Re: [DOCS] obsolete pg_receivexlog note?

2014-11-05 Thread Michael Paquier
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > On 10/20/14 2:07 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > The reference page for pg_receivexlog > > (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/app-pgreceivexlog.html) has > > this note: > > > > """ > > When using pg_receivexlog instead of archive_

Re: [DOCS] obsolete pg_receivexlog note?

2014-11-05 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 10/20/14 2:07 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > The reference page for pg_receivexlog > (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/app-pgreceivexlog.html) has > this note: > > """ > When using pg_receivexlog instead of archive_command, the server will > continue to recycle transaction log files eve