On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
>> Perhaps should be:
>> SELECT and HAVING clauses are evaluated.
> Let's do so then
Oops, that should be my task, but you got there first. :)
> and mark that as ready for committer
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
> Perhaps should be:
> SELECT and HAVING clauses are evaluated.
>
> Other than that, looks good to me.
Let's do so then and mark that as ready for committer.
Thanks,
--
Michael
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
inde
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
> Ah, OK. I wasn't aware of this execution order. Now we could as well
> split the description flow into more tiny paragraphs but this does not
> seem worth it.
Agreed.
Actually now that I read it...
+ values. All aggregate functions
