On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:53:51PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:51:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > I see 34 instance of "=>" in our docs. Shouldn't the '>' be escaped,
> > > e.g. =>?
> >
> > In principle, yes, though you can often get away
On 2015-08-05 00:13, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
The alternative is to turn the feature on automatically if it sees that
the master also has it on, i.e. the value would not be what the config
file says it is. Doing this wou
The last, in particular, is wrong: I find 1993 vintage email threads
(on GRASS)
w/ a sigblock:
-Boris Livshitz
Postgres Group
UC-Berkeley, Computer Science
Oh ok, I had forgotten the text was up there in the video.
Fair enough. Then again, I found this:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/livs
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 08:45:16PM +0200, er wrote:
> On 2015-08-05 20:17, Ross Reedstrom wrote:
> >In reponse to Bruce's call for action on his blog, I spent my
> >lunch hour doing
> >a bit of transcription. Attached patch transcribes the list of
> >Berkely students
> >and staff who help write Pos
On 2015-08-05 20:17, Ross Reedstrom wrote:
In reponse to Bruce's call for action on his blog, I spent my lunch
hour doing
a bit of transcription. Attached patch transcribes the list of Berkely
students
and staff who help write Postgres from Dr. Stonebraker's Turing
Lecture:
https://www.youtub
In reponse to Bruce's call for action on his blog, I spent my lunch hour doing
a bit of transcription. Attached patch transcribes the list of Berkely students
and staff who help write Postgres from Dr. Stonebraker's Turing Lecture:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbGeKi6T6QI&feature=youtu.be&t=1h1
