Re: [DOCS] end of the line for Jade and DSSSL

2017-04-06 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 4/5/17 00:16, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut writes: >> One thing I didn't carry over is the single-page HTML output (make >> postges.html). This could be added, but I'm not sure if anyone was >> using that. > > The discussion that led up to that seems to be this thread: > https://www.pos

Re: [DOCS] Window function docs

2017-04-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 06:43:38PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Thu, Apr  6, 2017 at 03:53:24PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > > > hypothetical-set aggregates as being distinct from ordered-set > aggregates > yet

Re: [DOCS] Window function docs

2017-04-06 Thread David G. Johnston
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 03:53:24PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > > > hypothetical-set aggregates as being distinct from ordered-set > aggregates yet > > the tables and the docs here do. > > Do you have any suggested text for that? > - ​T

Re: [DOCS] Window function docs

2017-04-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 03:53:24PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > As part of writing a talk about window functions, I have done some > cleanups of the window function docs, attached, that I would like to > apply to head. > >

Re: [DOCS] Window function docs

2017-04-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 06:13:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > As part of writing a talk about window functions, I have done some > > cleanups of the window function docs, attached, that I would like to > > apply to head. > > I think this change is just wrong: > > agg

Re: [DOCS] Window function docs

2017-04-06 Thread David G. Johnston
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > As part of writing a talk about window functions, I have done some > cleanups of the window function docs, attached, that I would like to > apply to head. +1 Overall. Some minor technical items noted below. The only conceptual item is whe

Re: [DOCS] Window function docs

2017-04-06 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > As part of writing a talk about window functions, I have done some > cleanups of the window function docs, attached, that I would like to > apply to head. I think this change is just wrong: aggregate function, but the OVER clause causes it to be -treated as a win

[DOCS] Window function docs

2017-04-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
As part of writing a talk about window functions, I have done some cleanups of the window function docs, attached, that I would like to apply to head. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As