On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:33 PM, wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/intarray.html
> Description:
>
[...]
> At the moment I am a little unclear whether intarray is effectively a
> deprecated module,
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/intarray.html
Description:
Would it be possible for the intarray documentation to describe its benefits
over regular int[]?
At the moment I am a little unclear whether intarray is
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Erwin Brandstetter
wrote:
> On top of this (separate issue?) ',' and '.' are ***not*** interpreted
> according to the current LC_NUMERIC setting. I.e.: even with (example)
> Austrian locale, ',' still is interpreted as group separator and '.' still
> is the decima
On 21 August 2017 at 16:30, David G. Johnston
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Erwin Brandstetter
> wrote:
>
>> The manual suggests here:
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-for
>> matting.html#FUNCTIONS-FORMATTING-TABLE
>>
>> > to_number(text, text) | numeri
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Erwin Brandstetter
wrote:
> The manual suggests here:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-
> formatting.html#FUNCTIONS-FORMATTING-TABLE
>
> > to_number(text, text) | numeric convert string to numeric | to_number
> ('12,454.8-', '99G999D9S
The manual suggests here:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-formatting.html#FUNCTIONS-FORMATTING-TABLE
> to_number(text, text) | numeric convert string to numeric | to_number
('12,454.8-', '99G999D9S')
The example fails for locales where the comma (',') does not happen to
