Re: [DOCS] pg_replication_slots page links

Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 8/22/17 09:36, sahapa...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi all, > > There isnt any link between 9.4 - replication slot page and other newer > > ones. > > > > check pages; > > > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/catalog-pg-replication-slots.html > >

Re: [DOCS] Duplicative index entries in v10/HEAD builds

Tom Lane wrote: > How do we get rid of those duplicative (and not-appropriate-to-the- > main-topic) links on the first line? Hmm, is it related to this previous report of mine? https://postgr.es/m/20170315160525.42x4wxtdhk3sa522@alvherre.pgsql -- Álvaro Herrera

Re: [DOCS] max_replication_slots in subscriber for subscription?

jonny.batti...@gmail.com wrote: > In this section: > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/logical-replication-config.html > > the following sentences make no sense in the way replication slots are > designed: > > The subscriber also requires the max_replication_slots to be set. In > this

Re: [DOCS] Need help finding all possible parameters for wal_level

None wrote: > Hi all, > > Thank you. I'm using 9.6. I found all the available options in the > 'postgresql.conf' file on the server itself. The explanations are good, but > I was looking for something like this: > > # minimal, archive, hot_standby, or logical > > I saw the 'replica' option in

Re: [DOCS] Default names for CRL and CA files in the backend

Michael Paquier wrote: > (Spotted a transation issue, so added Álvaro in the loop) > Álvaro, I think that those translations are incorrect: > src/backend/po/fr.po:#~ msgid "Make sure the root.crt file is present > and readable." > src/backend/po/ja.po:#~ msgid "Make sure the root.crt file is

Re: [DOCS] Use of term Master/Slave

Simon Riggs wrote: > On 31 July 2017 at 22:13, wrote: > > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/release-9-6.html > > Description: > > > > Wondering why PostgreSQL still uses the terms

Re: [DOCS] The format/layout of the tables seems to be broken

Alvaro Herrera wrote: > d...@dbi-services.com wrote: > > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > > > Page: > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/functions-event-triggers.html > > Description: > > > > The ta

Re: [DOCS] Site Administrators Gendered

Alvaro Herrera wrote: > case.roll...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Possibly, your site administrator has already created a database for > > your > > use. He should have told you what the name of your database is. > > > > should be > > > > Possi

Re: [DOCS] The format/layout of the tables seems to be broken

d...@dbi-services.com wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/functions-event-triggers.html > Description: > > The tables under 9.28.1. and 9.28.2. dont look like they should, I > believe Odd. I wonder

Re: [DOCS] Site Administrators Gendered

case.roll...@gmail.com wrote: > Possibly, your site administrator has already created a database for > your > use. He should have told you what the name of your database is. > > should be > > Possibly, your site administrator has already created a database for > your > use. They should have

Re: [DOCS] Minor typo

tgooda...@gmail.com wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/runtime-config-query.html > Description: > > "Better ways to improve the quality of the plans chosen by the optimizer > include adjusting the

Re: [DOCS] Legal Notice page in 10 not "backwards compatible" in online docs

Magnus Hagander wrote: > > The easiest way to fix the one that Daniel reported would be to just make > > it have the same name as before, wouldn't it? That would also automatically > > fix any other cases that would possibly link to LEGALNOTICE. (AFAIK this is > > the only file that was caps

Re: [DOCS] Legal Notice page in 10 not "backwards compatible" in online docs

Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > The Legal Notice page has in 10 changed from being uppercased to lowercased, > and in the process the site no longer sees it as being present in previous > version of the documentation: > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/LEGALNOTICE.html >

[DOCS] with

While reviewing Tomas' extended statistics patch I noticed that the new docbook toolchain produces additional links for each indexterm, based on the tags there are. For instance, in 9.5 I see this: statistics, Aggregate Functions, The Statistics Collector of the planner, Statistics Used by

Re: [DOCS] PDF building with FOP

Peter Eisentraut wrote: > The questions for those who are building PDFs are > > - Can you make the build work? It worked fine for me after installing the "fop" package. No need to rerun configure. > - Does the output look OK? It looks generally sane in a very quick skim, modulo the problems

Re: [DOCS] Docbook 5.x

Alexander Law wrote: > 14.09.2016 18:30, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >What's up with 30? > > ecpg.sgml contains "The scope of the allocated descriptor is > WHAT?.", which is printed with XSLT but ignored with DSSSL. > > Maybe we can just remove such remarks. I

Re: [DOCS] Docbook 5.x

Jürgen Purtz wrote: > Hello Alexander, > > great job! > > In my opinion most of the differences are not only acceptable but even > better. Agreed. But there are a few that merit a fix. There are a few that look a matter of style (XSL output looks odd), another few are not important. But I

Re: [DOCS] Broken Link

Barbara Sims wrote: > Hi, > > Just wanted to let you know about a link that seems to be broken on this page > http://tpchihuahua.uach.mx/cvsup.html. > > It is this link http://www.research.digital.com/SRC/modula-3/html/home.html, > but the site doesn’t seem to be active any more. I thought

Re: [DOCS] Undocumented behavior od DROP SCHEMA ... CASCADE

Tom Lane wrote: > > also, object locks need to be acquired, which > > can be very troublesome if you discover that some frequently-used object > > is in the set to be dropped, by some unfortunate accident. > > You'd need the object locks in any case, to be sure things hold still long > enough

Re: [DOCS] Undocumented behavior od DROP SCHEMA ... CASCADE

Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > I think it'd be a good idea to add some more discoverability: what would > > be deleted if an object X were to be deleted? > > There's plenty of discoverability already. The documentation su

Re: [DOCS] Undocumented behavior od DROP SCHEMA ... CASCADE

Tom Lane wrote: > I'm inclined to suggest that maybe the generic phrasing could be > "Automatically drop objects that depend on the [(such as ...)], > and in turn all objects that depend on those objects". I think it'd be a good idea to add some more discoverability: what would be deleted if an

Re: [DOCS] [GENERAL] question on parsing postgres sql queries

Kevin Grittner wrote: > On the other hand, try connecting to a database with > psql and typing: > > \h create index > > ... (or any other command name). The help you get there is fished > out of the docs. BTW I noticed a few days ago that we don't have a "where BLAH can be one of" section for

Re: [DOCS] Pg_upgrade and collation

Peter Geoghegan wrote: > The best argument for ICU is the evidently lax attitude that the glibc > people have towards the correctness and consistency of their > collations: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320356#c3 > > Here, Carlos O'Donnell, a glic committer, says "Regarding

Re: [DOCS] DROP EXTENSION

Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Right; mschwan wrote private email to indicate that the function in > > question is: > > > CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.f_unaccent(text) > > RETURNS text AS > > $$ > >

Re: [DOCS] DROP EXTENSION

Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:00 AM, <msch...@opentext.com> wrote: > > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/sql-dropextension.html > > > Description: > > > I dropped an extension

Re: [DOCS] DROP EXTENSION

the function your own function depends on, but your own function remains in place. This seems very similar to the use case for which we added the ALTER OBJECT DEPEND ON EXTENSION (cited below) but not quite the same. Perhaps mschwan can clarify. commit f2fcad27d59c8e5c48f8fa0a96c8355e40f24273 Au

Re: [DOCS] Pg_upgrade and collation

Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 06:01:59PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:51:54PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > The attached patch documents that pg_upgrade requires old/new servers to >

Re: [DOCS] Pg_upgrade and collation

Bruce Momjian wrote: > The attached patch documents that pg_upgrade requires old/new servers to > use compatibile collation library versions as well. I think this is way too thin to be helpful: > --- 61,68 > checking for compatible compile-time settings, including 32/64-bit >

Re: [DOCS] Math function description issue

Tom Lane wrote: > =?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=bcrgen_Purtz?= writes: > > a) In my opinion this wording is easier to understand because it avoids > > the negation via "not less". > > That's a fair point. > > The other difference is least/greatest versus smallest/largest. I'm not > sure

Re: [DOCS] log_min_autovacuum_duration parameter is incorrect

星合 拓馬 wrote: > Hi all, > > In the Release Notes 9.5, it seems that one parameter name is incorrect. > In the Monitoring of Changes section, > parameter called log_min_autovacuum_duration is incorrect. > log_autovacuum_min_duration is correct. It seems I typo'ed the parameter name in the commit

Re: [DOCS] Docbook 5.x

Jürgen Purtz wrote: > after some manual interventions (which must become part of an algorithm) > it's possible to created the complete PDF file for the db4 production chain: > *.sgml -- (perl) --> *.xml and after that step: postgres.xml -- (evaluate > XInclude with xmllint) --> postgres_all.xml

Re: [DOCS] Docbook 5.x

Jürgen Purtz wrote: > Hello Alvaro, > > yes, character entities respectively their values must be kept (what you > have seen is an intermediate state). We will use utf-8, so every possible > Unicode code point can be used directly. But we use not only character > entities, there are also

Re: [DOCS] Docbook 5.x

Alexander Law wrote: > Hello Jürgen, > > As was stated in the aforementioned thread, solution 2 can be much (8x) > faster with some xslt optimizations, but I think now we should outline some > roadmap before we start to prepare patches and so. Can the Docbook5 build be sped up with similar

Re: [DOCS] Docbook 5.x

Jürgen Purtz wrote: > Hi, > actually we use DocBook V4.2 for the PostgreSQL manuals. I suggest an > upgrade to DocBook 5.x. This sounds simple, but it will be a long process > with many sub-tasks. Yes, agreed. The killer objection placed last time was that it took something like 10x longer to

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] The number of bytes is stored in index_size of pgstatindex() ?

Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> there are usage patterns where half-dead pages might accumulate. > > > > Other than a usage pattern of "randomly SIGKILL backends every few > > seconds", I don't see how that would happen. > > I

Re: [DOCS] Graphic to visualize data flow between processes, buffers and files

Jürgen Purtz wrote: > Recommendations: > > * We suggest the use of Inkscape. It creates the above mentioned >format by performing the following steps > o File | Clean up document > o File | Save as | Plain SVG As in the original discussion, this is probably too fiddly and the

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby

Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Not sure what is going on; my reading of the code certainly says that > the data should be there. I'm looking into it. > > I also noticed that I didn't actually push the whole of the patch > yesterday -- I neglected to "git add" the latest cha

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby

Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Fujii Masao wrote: > > So firstly you will push those "latest" changes soon? > > It seems like these changes haven't been pushed yet, and unfortunately > that's probably a beta blocker. I'm on this. -- Álvaro Herrera

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby

Fujii Masao wrote: > Sorry for not reviewing the patch before you push it... > > In HEAD, I ran very simple test case: > > 1. enable track_commit_timestamp > 2. start the server > 3. run some transactions > 4. execute pg_last_committed_xact() -- returns non-null values > 5. shutdown the server

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby

Petr Jelinek wrote: > While this seems good, I'd code it slightly differently. I didn't like the > addition of new bool when it's not really needed. This brings the question > if we actually need the BootStrapCommitTs and StartupCommitTs functions > which really don't do much though. Thanks,

Re: [DOCS] Minor addition to index documentation

Anastasia Lubennikova wrote: > Fix incomplete gist interface description. Hi, thanks for the patch. I think this sentence is a bit confusing: > > - GiST indexes require seven support functions, with an optional eighth, as > + GiST indexes require seven support functions, with two

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby

I paraphrase Fujii Masao, who wrote: > 1. Start the master and standby servers with track_commit_timestamp enabled. > 2. Disable track_commit_timestamp in the master and restart the master server. > 3. Run checkpoint in the master. > 4. Run restartpoint in the standby after the checkpoint WAL

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby

Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > I agree with that sentiment. > > > > > > Attached patch adds variable to the shmem which is used for module > > >

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby

Robert Haas wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote: > > I agree with that sentiment. > > > > Attached patch adds variable to the shmem which is used for module > > activation tracking - set to true in ActiveCommitTs() and false in > >

Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby

, Remote DBA, Training & Services commit 7441f88b746b7522f1714ed9fec95c3c4fe1dacb Author: Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> AuthorDate: Fri Oct 2 11:39:44 2015 -0300 CommitDate: Fri Oct 2 11:39:44 2015 -0300 Don't disable commit_ts in standby if enabled locally Bug

Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby

Robert Haas wrote: > The standby can have the feature enabled even though the master has it > disabled? That seems like it can only lead to heartache. Can you elaborate? -- Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training &

Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby

Fujii Masao wrote: > I've not read the patch yet, but the patched server with > track_commit_timestamp > enabled caused the following PANIC error when I ran pgbench. Ah, that was a stupid typo: I used || instead of &&. Fixed that. I also changed DeactivateCommitTs() so that it removes all

Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby

oonish...@nttdata.co.jp wrote: > The below error messages were shown in standby server log: > > FATAL: could not access status of transaction 9009 > DETAIL: Could not read from file "pg_commit_ts/" at offset 90112: > Success. > CONTEXT: xlog redo Transaction/COMMIT: 2015-09-30

Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby

Adding CC to hackers, since this is clearly not just a docs issue. Also CCing Petr and Craig since they are the ones that know how this is used in BDR. Robert Haas wrote: On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: The alternative is to turn the feature

Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby

Robert Haas wrote: On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote: One example which makes me a bit confusing is; both master and standby are running fine with track_commit_timestamp disabled, then I enable it only on the master. That is, the value of

Re: [DOCS] Confused by example in 13.2.2

Kevin Grittner wrote: Hopefully the example from the Wiki makes it clear. There has been some discussion about whether to link to the Wiki or bring an example like that into the documentation; but we usually don't link to Wiki pages and the example is somewhat long to include in-line in the

Re: [DOCS] bgworker / SPI docs patches

I wrote this a very long time ago but apparently it was eaten by a spam filter before it reached the lists. Resending. Craig Ringer wrote: From c73d1303cb3474ccc799eeda252eeef1fc3d9026 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 18:17:48 +1300

[DOCS] ALTER INDEX .. SET STATISTICS not documented

I'm sitting in Alexey Ermakov's talk and he just said that the command in $SUBJECT is not documented ... do we need a separate blurb about it somewhere? I just tried it and it does do something useful, at least for expression indexes, since we collect stats for those. This is news to me.

Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby

Fujii Masao wrote: Hi, 25.5.3. Administrator's Overview in the document - The setting of some parameters on the standby will need reconfiguration if they have been changed on the primary. For these parameters, the value on the standby

Re: [DOCS] pg_class.relminmxid and pg_database.datminmxid

Fujii Masao wrote: Hi, The descriptions of pg_class.relminmxid and pg_database.datminmxid have some minor problems in the doc. Seems the attached patch needs to be applied. Looks reasonable. I'm not sure about the term multitransaction anymore; we use multixact elsewhere (notably in the

Re: [DOCS] backup.sgml WIP (patch included)

Joshua D. Drake wrote: A change I did not make per Craig Ringer (and plenty of other people through the years): Instead we should be advising people to use pg_dump -Fc and pg_restore as their default and primary method of dumping a database. It is rarely desirable to use text dumps and if

Re: [DOCS] per feedback I received directly, pg_dump manpage patch

Joshua D. Drake wrote: The man page does not clearly state that pg_dump will not dump things like users or roles. It does mention briefly in the notes section that pg_dumpall is needed for items that are set via SET but that isn't very clear on the other items. I agree that we need a warning

Re: [DOCS] per feedback I received directly, pg_dump manpage patch

Joshua D. Drake wrote: On 05/27/2015 06:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Joshua D. Drake wrote: The man page does not clearly state that pg_dump will not dump things like users or roles. It does mention briefly in the notes section that pg_dumpall is needed for items that are set via SET

Re: [DOCS] dtrace pgfoundry link

Peter Eisentraut wrote: The last pgfoundry link in our docs is para More example scripts can be found in the PgFoundry ulink url=http://pgfoundry.org/projects/dtrace/;dtrace project/ulink. /para pgfoundry is now pretty much unusable, so we should update this. Does anyone

Re: [DOCS] [PATCH] Various documentation typo/grammar fixes

Kevin Grittner wrote: In patch 0003- I agree that the change to exactly the same reads better.  I'm torn on changing the hyphens to spaces.  I probably wouldn't change them, but I wouldn't squawk if others preferred to do so. Apparently adverb hyphenation discussion plagues the web. One

Re: [DOCS] [GENERAL] About upgrading a (tuple?) lock in a rollback'd sub-transaction

Amit Langote wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Rob Sargent robjsarg...@gmail.com wrote: And it also tells you how to stop it --bibtex iirc Yeah, it's a caution against a potentially harmful usage anyway. Users should not use it at all. I was just wondering if the description of

Re: [DOCS] having trouble building the postgres-A4.pdf

Jeff Frost wrote: ! pdfTeX error (ext4): \pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level than \pd fstartlink. Did you see this one? http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3b4139a6e0ceea903dd359b7035d5d4a.squir...@webmail.xs4all.nl -- Álvaro Herrera

Re: [DOCS] having trouble building the postgres-A4.pdf

Jeff Frost wrote: On 06/26/13 10:34, Jeff Frost wrote: On 06/26/13 10:31, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Jeff Frost wrote: ! pdfTeX error (ext4): \pdfendlink ended up in different nesting level than \pd fstartlink. Did you see this one? http://www.postgresql.org/message-id

Re: [DOCS] having trouble building the postgres-A4.pdf

Jeff Frost wrote: Yah, it's a different error when it's the wrong openjade version. It looks like this one that's in the docs: openjade:./stylesheet.dsl:664:2:E: flow object not accepted by port; only display flow objects accepted make: *** [postgres-A4.tex-pdf] Segmentation fault Hmm,

Re: [DOCS] having trouble building the postgres-A4.pdf

Jeff Frost wrote: Alvaro, did both the beta2 PDFs build fine on borka? If so, could you get them to me so I can build the RPMs while I figure out the issue with my tex/jade setup? I don't think borka builds those PDFs. But I tried locally, and I am sad to report that it fails here as well,

Re: [DOCS] having trouble building the postgres-A4.pdf

Jeff Frost wrote: Well, happy to hear that I'm not special, but sad to hear that it doesn't build. :-/ Agreed on both counts. Any idea how to fix it? Nope, but maybe try to build the PDF using the XML toolchain? -- Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL

Re: [DOCS] having trouble building the postgres-A4.pdf

Jeff Frost wrote: On Jun 26, 2013, at 13:20, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: Any idea how to fix it? Nope, but maybe try to build the PDF using the XML toolchain? I'm afraid that's a bit out of my depth. I would speculate that since the US PDF builds and the A4 format

Re: [DOCS] having trouble building the postgres-A4.pdf

Tom Lane wrote: The underlying bug is allegedly fixed as of TeX Live 2012; can you get hold of a newer toolchain? It fails there as well, I just tried. $ pdfjadetex This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.4-1.40.13 (TeX Live 2012/Debian) restricted \write18 enabled. -- Álvaro Herrera

Re: [DOCS] pdf does not build anymore

Tom Lane wrote: Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes: On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Also, FYI, this is claimed to be fixed in TeX Live 2012: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619481 so a toolchain upgrade is the long-term answer.

Re: [DOCS] 9.3 missing system catalog columns and views

Peter Eisentraut wrote: On 5/31/13 8:46 AM, Thom Brown wrote: pg_class.relminmxid pg_database.datminmxid Could someone add these in? These are from Álvaro's foreign-key locking patch. Perhaps he can fill these in, which an informed description. Sorry I missed the thread. Yes, will

Re: [DOCS] CREATE OPERATOR query

Robins Tharakan escribió: Further, I seem to have a similar problem with the EXECUTE check requirement as well. Sample SQL given below. BEGIN TRANSACTION; CREATE ROLE rol_op3; CREATE TYPE type_op3 AS ENUM ('new', 'open', 'closed'); CREATE FUNCTION fn_op3(type_op3, type_op3) RETURNS

Re: [DOCS] CREATE OPERATOR query

Robins Tharakan escribió: Yes, but the documentation states that EXECUTE permission for the function is required to even CREATE the operator. What I mean is that your new role still has said permission through PUBLIC (a pseudo-role which is automatically granted to all other roles and cannot be

Re: [DOCS] Adding caron to usernames in release notes

Bruce Momjian wrote: I just noticed from the commit logs that Pavel's name is spelled Pavel Stěhule. That mark above the e is a caron, and is explained here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caron http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%9A Can anyone suggest how to get that into the

Re: [DOCS] pg_xlogdump docs

Bruce Momjian wrote: I just noticed that pg_xlogdump uses an underscore in the file name, pg_xlogdump.sgml, unlike every other extension. Should this be fixed? I did mess about with hyphens vs. underscores vs. nothing at all. Most seem to use no char, so pgrowlocks.sgml for example, but that

Re: [DOCS] pg_xlogdump docs

Bruce Momjian wrote: On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 07:36:09PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: We do have other files that use underscores, anyway. Well, we have only four: generate_history.pl information_schema.sgml mk_feature_tables.pl pg_xlogdump.sgml Two are Perl scripts

Re: [DOCS] Russian translation publication

Alexander Law escribió: Hello, I have translated into Russian first two parts of the PostgreSQL documentation and want to publish my work. Can I create app for Google Play Market as an e-book that will contain my translation? Can I make it paid? Should I add some special notices to the

Re: [DOCS] PostgreSQL docs in ePub format

Edward Hooper escribió: If anyone from O'Reilly Media is on this mailing list please let me know how you do this, i.e. what tools you use and what commands you run to produce the ePub books that I buy from you. Would it work to just take the single-page HTML output (make postgres.html) and

Re: [DOCS] postgresql manuals

Excerpts from vilpesh's message of jue jul 19 07:47:29 -0400 2012: Hi Josh Stefan, Download location of postgresql-9.1-US http://www.postgresql.org/docs/manuals/ specifically http://www.postgresql.org/files/documentation/pdf/9.1/postgresql-9.1-US.pdf Details of postgresql-9.1-US File

Re: [DOCS] File format for SSL CRL file

Excerpts from Greg Smith's message of lun jul 02 20:30:07 -0400 2012: A documentation comment came in recently about ssl-tcp.html not specifying what format is expected for the CRL file. Seems like something that could be described better now that I look at it, so I'm passing that along

Re: [DOCS] Comment on max_locks_per_transaction

Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of jue jun 21 18:53:06 -0400 2012: I don't know, because I can't see what's changed if you don't send a diff. It would be fine if you sent a diff between plain text, to illustrate what you mean, even if it's not the actual source code. Odd; nobody

Re: [DOCS] separate Privileges section for SQL reference pages?

Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mar abr 17 14:40:37 -0300 2012: It occurred to me that it could be useful to separate the information about which privileges are necessary for a certain SQL command into a separate section Privileges on each SQL command reference page. Currently,

Re: [DOCS] Adding links to alternate versions of doc pages

Excerpts from Greg Sabino Mullane's message of mié mar 28 16:51:06 UTC 2012: Hash: RIPEMD160 What I would love love LOVE to see would be a dropdown by the Home â Documentation â Manuals â PostgreSQL 8.3 where I'm able to choose from other versions easily. Or maybe it will be a

Re: [DOCS] Update documentation wrt visibility map/index-only scans

Excerpts from Marti Raudsepp's message of vie mar 16 07:08:18 -0300 2012: On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 02:16, Marti Raudsepp ma...@juffo.org wrote: The documentation needs some updates now that we have index-only scans. Bump. No response for 2 weeks. Anyone? Add it here:

Re: [DOCS] Cannot build docs on Ubuntu 10.04?

Excerpts from John Lumby's message of mié mar 14 10:25:19 -0300 2012: On 12-01-2012 17:28, Josh Berkus wrote: Can't open perl script /bin/collateindex.pl: No such file or directory On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:37:20 -0300 Alvaro Herrera wrote:    dpkg -S collateindex.pl docbook-dsssl

Re: [DOCS] Cannot build docs on Ubuntu 10.04?

Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of jue ene 12 17:28:28 -0300 2012: To be more specific, having installed all of the requirements listed in builddocs, I'm still getting a fatal error: make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/test/doc/src/sgml' { \ echo !ENTITY version

Re: [DOCS] Cannot build docs on Ubuntu 10.04?

Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of jue ene 12 18:43:39 -0300 2012: The warning about unknown warning type means you're using the wrong tool to me. My toolchain here uses openjade which is a fork of the earlier jade (so install opensp as Kevin suggested, and rerun configure after

Re: [DOCS] Cannot build docs on Ubuntu 10.04?

Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue ene 12 18:55:41 -0300 2012: Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes: LC_ALL=C '/usr/bin/perl' /bin/collateindex.pl -f -g -i 'bookindex' -o bookindex.sgml HTML.index Can't open perl script /bin/collateindex.pl: No such file or directory On Fedora,

Re: [DOCS] small mvcc.sqml improvents

Excerpts from Erik Rijkers's message of vie dic 16 19:04:06 -0300 2011: Here are two small changes to mvcc.sgml: 1. typo ('are' for 'at') 2. Change title of Table 13.1 to say 'Standard SQL' instead of just 'SQL', to make immediately clear that the table does /not/ show the levels in

Re: [DOCS] building the docs on Debian

Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of lun dic 12 22:45:20 -0300 2011: I just tried to build our docs on Debian Squeeze using our instructions for Debian: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/docguide-toolsets.html apt-get install docbook docbook-dsssl docbook-xsl openjade1.3

Re: [DOCS] PG documentation build is wedged

Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of jue nov 24 14:44:18 -0300 2011: You need to change the config of this animal to something like: optional_steps = { build_docs = { branches = [ 'HEAD' ], min_hours_since = 0 } }, There's no point in not building the docs for HEAD on every

Re: [DOCS] PG documentation build is wedged

Excerpts from Stefan Kaltenbrunner's message of jue nov 24 17:45:07 -0300 2011: On 11/24/2011 09:16 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: # ldap support is new as of 8.2 if ($branch eq 'HEAD' || $branch ge 'REL8_2') this basically means do only if $branch is exactly HEAD or if $branch is greater

Re: [DOCS] PG documentation build is wedged

Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié nov 23 23:55:22 -0300 2011: According to http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/buildlog.html the git-tip documentation build hasn't happened since the 19th, and a quick look-around at http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/index.html

Fwd: Re: Fwd: [DOCS] Link to PAM pages broken

--- Begin forwarded message from Thorsten Kukuk --- From: Thorsten Kukuk ku...@thkukuk.de To: Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:40:03 -0300 Subject: Re: Fwd: [DOCS] Link to PAM pages broken Hi Alvaro, Am Samstag 29 Oktober 2011, 00:24:18 schrieben Sie: Andrew

Re: [DOCS] non-ASCII characters in SGML documentation (and elsewhere)

Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mié oct 12 18:21:19 -0300 2011: Alvaro Herrera wrote: Excerpts from Susanne Ebrecht's message of vie may 20 09:04:26 -0400 2011: On 20.05.2011 13:56, Tom Lane wrote: * Should we allow non-ASCII characters in general source files

Re: [DOCS] coalesce

Excerpts from Henry Drexler's message of mié sep 21 12:50:18 -0300 2011: thanks, so I take it I am not getting those more complex examples (that are apparently beyond my use case), I will take a look at them again. Maybe the fix is just to add a simpler example, without altering the wording

Re: [DOCS] DOCUMENTATION IN OTHERS IDIOMS

Excerpts from Jaime Casanova's message of mié ago 10 23:00:00 -0400 2011: On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote: Excerpts from francisco natera's message of mié ago 10 12:56:40 -0400 2011: Please is posible the documentación in SPANISH? tell me

Re: [DOCS] DOCUMENTATION IN OTHERS IDIOMS

Excerpts from francisco natera's message of mié ago 10 12:56:40 -0400 2011: Please is posible the documentación in SPANISH? tell me how i can down No, we don't have it. -- Álvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication,

Re: [DOCS] pg_stat_database not in the index 9.0.4

Excerpts from Emanuel Calvo's message of lun jul 11 15:59:44 -0400 2011: I realized that the view pg_stat_database is not in the book index: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/bookindex.html Maybe it must point to: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/monitoring-stats.html

Re: [DOCS] File_FDW with example

Excerpts from Joshua Berkus's message of jue jun 16 21:21:36 -0400 2011: (apologies for prior incomplete post. Webmail spazzed on me). Attached is a version of file_FDW.sgml which contains a complete example of how to use it to read your postgresql csv logs. I think this does some neat

Re: [DOCS] Improve warnings around CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY

Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun jun 13 12:11:48 -0400 2011: On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote: Back to the doc patch I submitted...is that a useful step toward making this issue visible enough to users for now to help? Alvaro, did

  1   2   3   >