Re: [DOCS] wording for 38.6.2.4. Simple CASE and 38.6.2.5. Searched CASE

Alvaro Herrera schrieb: "simple case" and "searched case" is SQL/PSM's terminology. I'm not sure it's necessarily a good idea to deviate from that. See SQL part 4, 13.6 : Function Provide conditional execution based on truth of s or on equality of operands. Format ::= | ::= CAS

Re: [DOCS] wording for 38.6.2.4. Simple CASE and 38.6.2.5. Searched CASE

Andreas Wenk schrieb: Tom Lane wrote: Hmm, it would be important to keep this in sync with the core-SQL description of CASE, no? (Section 9.16.1) yes. And there is written "general" form and "simple" form. I like that. I can't say that I think "simple CASE

Re: [DOCS] wording for 38.6.2.4. Simple CASE and 38.6.2.5. Searched CASE

Tom Lane wrote: Hmm, it would be important to keep this in sync with the core-SQL description of CASE, no? (Section 9.16.1) yes. And there is written "general" form and "simple" form. I like that. I can't say that I think "simple CASE" and "searched CASE" are good descriptions of the two for

[DOCS] wording for 38.6.2.4. Simple CASE and 38.6.2.5. Searched CASE

Hi, I find it a little confusing how 38.6.2.4. Simple CASE and 38.6.2.5. Searched CASE is described. In Simple CASE is written CASE search-expression WHEN expression [, and in 38.6.2.5. Searched CASE is written CASE WHEN boolean-expression IMO speaking of a search-expression

Re: [DOCS] finding WITH in documentation

Magnus Hagander wrote: On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 18:22, Andreas Wenk wrote: Hi, I am wondering why I can't find anything if I use WITH as the search expression in the online documentation, but get a big result list, if I use WITH RECURSIVE ... IMO the resulting list should be the same for

[DOCS] finding WITH in documentation

Hi, I am wondering why I can't find anything if I use WITH as the search expression in the online documentation, but get a big result list, if I use WITH RECURSIVE ... IMO the resulting list should be the same for both search expressions. Andy ideas? Cheers Andy -- Sent via pgsql-docs mai

Re: [DOCS] dead link in online documentation 49.4 Further Reading 8.4

Alvaro Herrera schrieb: Andreas Wenk wrote: Hi, the link "The Hitch-Hiker's Guide to Evolutionary Computation" http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/Mirrors/ftp.de.uu.net/EC/clife/www/location.htm does not work for me. A page of the University of Birmingham says, that the document

[DOCS] dead link in online documentation 49.4 Further Reading 8.4

Hi, the link "The Hitch-Hiker's Guide to Evolutionary Computation" http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/Mirrors/ftp.de.uu.net/EC/clife/www/location.htm does not work for me. A page of the University of Birmingham says, that the document cannot be found (404). online documentation 8.4 topic 49.4 Further