Re: [DOCS] Large SGML Cleanup

2010-11-03 Thread Chris Browne
pete...@gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) writes: > In general, I think the more efficient way to address this overall > problem is to run the resulting HTML through tidy and be done with it. +1. I use similar toolchain for my own web site, and one of the steps is to run tidy on the output, which rectif

Re: [DOCS] Documentation and explanatory diagrams

2010-07-08 Thread Chris Browne
br...@momjian.us (Bruce Momjian) writes: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Tom Lane wrote: >> >> > Alvaro Herrera writes: >> >> Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue jul 01 21:52:00 -0400 >> >> 2010: >> >>> Is there something that makes installing dia more challenging th

Re: [DOCS] Documentation and explanatory diagrams

2010-07-08 Thread Chris Browne
t...@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) writes: > Alvaro Herrera writes: >> Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue jul 01 21:52:00 -0400 2010: >>> Is there something that makes installing dia more challenging than the >>> other documentation build tools? > >> Err, I dunno -- it's just an apt-get aw

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

2006-11-06 Thread Chris Browne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes: > With no new additions submitted today, I have moved my text into our > SGML documentation: > > http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/failover.html > > Please let me know what additional changes are needed. It's looking a lot improved to me...

[DOCS] Changing Defaults - NAMELEN...

2005-05-31 Thread Chris Browne
We're running into an issue with Slony-I documentation; I thought there might be some wisdom possibly available here as the tools are the same... The Situation: We're using Rod Taylor's "autodoc" package to generate documentation for the database schema and the pl/pgsql functions The Problem

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Tutorial

2004-07-25 Thread Chris Browne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) writes: > David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 04:30:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> If we're going to remove from the tutorial every feature for which >>> any aspect is deemed by someone to be broken, the tutorial is liable >>> to become